High Court Kerala High Court

J.K.Aneesh vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 17 September, 2007

Kerala High Court
J.K.Aneesh vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 17 September, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 5562 of 2007()


1. J.K.ANEESH, S/O.JOSEPH KALAYIL
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
                       ...       Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :17/09/2007

 O R D E R
                               R.BASANT, J.
                            ----------------------
                          B.A.No.5562 of 2007
                      ----------------------------------------
             Dated this the 17th day of September 2007

                                 O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner is a doctor

who works in an Ayurvedic Hospital & Research Centre, Kozhikode.

The crux of the allegations against him is that he had committed

breach of the stipulations of the Foreigners Act in not having reported

the stay of one foreign national in his hospital. Crime has been

registered. Investigation is in progress. The petitioner apprehends

imminent arrest.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner is absolutely innocent. The in-patients were foreign

nationals and the fact was reported to the authorities. There was a by-

stander who was not residing in the hospital and therefore bona fide

believing that his name need not be reported, his name was not

reported. There was no wilful intentional omission to report.

Inasmuch as such person was not residing at the hospital and

undergoing treatment, his name was not reported. Anticipatory bail

may, in these circumstances be granted to the petitioner, it is prayed.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor does not oppose the

application and I am satisfied that directions under Section 438

Cr.P.C can be issued in favour of the petitioner.

B.A.No.5562/07 2

4. In the result, this petition is allowed. Following directions

are issued under Section 438 Cr.P.C in favour of the petitioner.

i) Petitioner shall surrender before the learned Magistrate

having jurisdiction at 11 a.m on 24/09/2007.

ii) He shall be released on regular bail on condition that he

executes a bond for Rs.25,000/-(Rupees twenty five thousand only)

with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of

the learned Magistrate.

iii) The petitioner shall make himself available for

interrogation before the investigating officer between 10 a.m and 12

noon on 25/09/2007 and thereafter as and when directed by the

investigating officer in writing to do so.

(iv) If the petitioner does not appear before the learned

Magistrate as directed in clause (i), directions issued above shall

thereafter stand revoked and the police shall be at liberty to arrest

the petitioner and deal with him in accordance with law, as if these

directions were not issued at all.

(v) If he were arrested prior to 24/09/2007, he shall be

released from custody on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees

twenty five thousand only) without any sureties, undertaking to

appear before the learned Magistrate on 24/09/2007.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
jsr

B.A.No.5562/07 3

B.A.No.5562/07 4

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.CNo.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF MAY2007