High Court Karnataka High Court

J Kenchesh vs M/S Management Of on 29 October, 2010

Karnataka High Court
J Kenchesh vs M/S Management Of on 29 October, 2010
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARMTAKA. BANGAI}dI{I:*3~.'
ac] W   ._ u

DATED THIS TI-IE. -'D£WOF OOTOBEH,' 2OT1O    

BEFORE'  

THE HON'BLE MR..msT1cE  

WRIT PETITION NO;6:j%'1T9 O1%*"2o1OT:(:.-Tifiim 
BETWEEN:  ' ' " i

J KENCHESH,   -.
S/O GUDDA RANGAPPA, --
AGED 40 YEARS; , V 
OCC. PRESS OPERATOR, :; -V

R/AT T1;JAs.13U1i;D--1NOj,«_ _   T

  
JANATHA COLONY,   ~ 
H.N. NAGAR .1%osT,?:  
ANEKALTp.L,UK,--«.__"a  . J ...PETITIO§\IER

{BY SRLA 3: R B LOKNATH, A1:>v..)

 " M/Ts ix/1}&1\:.A'O1;MENT'OF FINE
 ' COMPOVNENIS TOOLS PVT.
~ 1. REFERRING, NO'. 1 10/ H,

BOIVIIMASANDRA INDUSTRIAL AREA,
BANGAETORIES. ...RESPONDENT

{BY Y N GUPTA AND J ARAVIND BABU. ADV..)

H = .. THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226

OF’ THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT

M

,2.”

THE RESPONDENT COMEDANY TO {DAY BACKVVAGES{&FROM
THE DATE OF DISMISSAL AND TO TILL THE
REENSTATEMENT, INCLUSING ALL ‘ »

CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS IN PRODUCED Af:’5.ANi\i§::<;Ui2as:,

C AND E'I'C..

THIS pmmow COMING omrofiieRL1iiEi§i%I1$id’iN”‘*3’
GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE FO§,LOVJING:”< '

o R
The petitionefs;:ei3.im_'_"i;oiftdéeiewages rejected
by award dated' 7. 10.'Q_9V:'ii71V /05 of the II
Addl. La¥oo12i1¥ presented this
._ -of the award impugned
discloseS'–e:that Court recorded a finding of

factithat theV"pe.tition:er did not discharge duties for the

ix 16.10.2002 to– 11.8.2009 and hence

H d:ée.1iriVeciV".'i;jaeT1§i§i7ages for the said period, while however

greiitifig neontinuity of service. This fact of not

éis'eha;iiging duties not being in dispute, no exception

M