High Court Madras High Court

J.Kurshit Begum vs The Collector on 26 November, 2007

Madras High Court
J.Kurshit Begum vs The Collector on 26 November, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                              
                      DATED : 26/11/2007
                              
                            CORAM
                              
            THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN
                              
                Writ Petition No.8603 of 1999
                              



J.Kurshit Begum                   		..Petitioner.


            Versus
                              

1.	The Collector
	Tiruvannamalai District	
	Collectorate
        Tiruvannamalai.

2.	The Commissioner
	Tiruvannamalai Municipality
	Tiruvannamalai.

3.	The Tahsildar
	Tiruvannamalai.                  	..Respondents.




Prayer:   This writ petition is filed under Article  226  of
the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ
of  Mandamus  forbearing the respondents or any  authorities
acting  under  them  from in any way  interfering  with  the
petitioner's  peaceful  possession  and  enjoyment  of   the
property  situate in Tiruvannamalai Town,  4th  Ward,  Block
No.28,  T.S.No.1764/24, Plot No.34, South of  30  ft.  road,
North  of  Plot No.52, East of the house built in Poramboke,
West of Plot No.35 in between measuring East-West 30 ft.  on
the  Northern side, 42 ft on the Southern side,  North-South
53  ft. on the Western side (with triangular measurement  of
22  ft.  on the West) and 60 ft. on the Eastern side totally
measuring 2630 sq.ft. Vacant site with basement.




	For Petitioner  : Mr.S.Sivakumar for Sarvabhauman Associates

	For Respondents : Mr.V.Manoharan, Government Advocate (R1 & R3)
        	          Mr.M.Devaraj (R2)




                          O R D E R

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the

learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had sought the

permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He

has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. Based on the endorsement made by the learned counsel

appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed

as withdrawn. No costs.

csh

To

1. The Collector
Tiruvannamalai District
Collectorate
Tiruvannamalai.

2. The Commissioner
Tiruvannamalai Municipality
Tiruvannamalai.

3. The Tahsildar
Tiruvannamalai.