Karnataka High Court
J N Murthy vs State Of Karnataka on 6 June, 2008
"gm
IN mam Hxafi coma? OF KARxAmAKA AT aAnaa§egm
namma wars mum 6" may or JUNE,.ééé3fwf¥;f.
ram HON'BLE MR. Jvsmxcg L u3§A$AfiA*sfiAMx a;
wax? FETITIGN NO,8468f2Ga7{@MwR%C} j
BETWEEN: '."m. " ~. ~.';"~w'
1 J N MURTHY _m'»_=,
sic LATE 3. Laxsnmxxagagaggg
RXAT 540/27, 2ND_B{CEu5S} "_",
AN§AIAH REEDY Layonwgk' 'a=
aamaswanz ,w-_< V.a
£$MfiALQRE~55Q:0é3$2 _ =
i 3*' .=A1_ s». ;:§ smmxwxommx
{fly Mia samrfixbg fiEGBE_A$SDCI$$ES
ma gangs; K:Rax=$HETwy,gAnvs., )
up...-------
1 SEATE 0? Kganamnfla'; =_,
R2PaEsENwmn"aY'Iws=SECRETARK
REvENfiE"nEFARTmExm
" ' ..... .. V
':_aANaaLag£+§5Q_ao1
2 fH$ ccaMi$sic$2g
DE?AREM®NT*QFAENBQWNMEfiTS
L"'= mEHAfl$SHWkR_EHAVAfl,
%_ --cuaAJ?Eg,
*~f~¢fiANQALOREh18
'.3«.THm»$EEcxAL nzpvmy comxssxomma
1, _3A$GALORE nzswazcm,
"._KRISHI EHAVAN, K.G. RQAD,
. E&fiG&LORE
-2-
4 AssxsmANm comzssxonma
MUZARAI wnxxs,
coapoaawxon ARE&
329 rnooa, panzum BEOCK
VESHfiESHWARAIAH mowmns,
aAxeALoaE~5se 001. ~W"~. ; _. ». -J: »
1. ..;;Ra$9omn£Nms.,_
{BY Sxi N KUMAR HCGP *. 1 " V3,'. ~'.'-
THIS w.?. FILEE Phgyxxa $0; guasaifiag sexism
aw. 25.4.2007 Eassan Ex *$HE $Eccx3 VRESPONDENE
Vina ANNEX.A. QUASH raE¢ ognmn *32. }25.4.2ae?
aassmn BY R2 vInE'AmNEx;s;»; * ""
wars wax? pmwmxxew uemzxe UN $03 PRELIMIRARE
BEARING xx 3,w GRQfl9_EH1S'DA3} ins COflRT MADE THE
E0LLQWXNG; Wa". i '=-."T=.' V
;,£hQTp§tifi;¢né%Léfihmit5§that he was apyointad
as }B&shk%i' [in i§é-- fiadxe of Seaend Diviaion
Clerk *t§ $fi_xfinfi%3%$a Swamy Tempie, Bangalore
Sg§£h.¥alfik. V Tfie salary 0f the petitioner was
' §éin§E §&$d fra the tample fund till 19?4.
A= her%@ffiefiH the semwnd respandant infarmad tha
Athird"i§$pondent that a 'yaahkar' is nah a
V". Govéxfimmnt fiexvant. Ax yer the said
u xgémmmnimatian, the benefitfi granted to the
Epetitionex was withdrawn. subsequently, the
...3-
Enfimmwent Coxrnzisaioner by zneans cf an oréezgf dated
29w?w1986 created a clerk post on a» m§n¢h1y
galaxy of Rs.450/--. The said i--1953
"zzzzmzezscaa-ssfully challenged by the-*";:zréf;£.*:t:'i£§ne.§r "by
filing W? No.1G723/1996. Ehagaéffiéx the st§£g by"
order dated 4w12«1997:_san¢t;§ned _:a¢f:$ca;é" gs?
Suaczcmd. Qivision C3.ez'3C"V'v"g_'V"" "th§'.3 ' 'i:.S;ta'fl.3»??t1!eHx?. The
Endowment Cenmi.sf:si:§,«pne4ié""'_'V' "~h«;'.s ' <:¥x<EiV. er dated
5--6»-2004 re-fixe::1"1:;1s¢é.=. éiafirQc»fi.:_ 'i;ii¢ _'petitianar from
1974 fin tpeQ§¢ax§f$§j$e§é§¢,§i§i§1on Ci&xk. Wham
thinga gté¢d=®@fisQ,§a_§s%§~:aa7 iAnnexuremA}, a
notgée "came §£m h§ igéaad by the Endnwmant
C:m:t§S.--5sfli;.m:§erVV -. _ t,~3:m~' patitimner ahould re--gay
Ra ;,a§}32a/e . weiag tha finanaial benefits
ggtaaaaa t&"~%im within saven days. mhe
' ;.V:§t'97§;iVt'iiEifii€%§3% --ha.:s mam produced Annexuxrems the mrcler
A-;'»Z*{Lji*_'a«~VAlci¢;xi§fV1 fram the date
sf rec.*:e.:§€..;;:ut.v. 'Ifixa secsanci respondent
an consider the same
and pa.f3«s V orflera within arm math
the@r_:eofV’.L””~V VfI’i*:ae_’v–;:>:.1Te’:r .
Sd/-
Judge