Karnataka High Court
J N Murthy vs State Of Karnataka on 6 June, 2008
"gm IN mam Hxafi coma? OF KARxAmAKA AT aAnaa§egm namma wars mum 6" may or JUNE,.ééé3fwf¥;f. ram HON'BLE MR. Jvsmxcg L u3§A$AfiA*sfiAMx a; wax? FETITIGN NO,8468f2Ga7{@MwR%C} j BETWEEN: '."m. " ~. ~.';"~w' 1 J N MURTHY _m'»_=, sic LATE 3. Laxsnmxxagagaggg RXAT 540/27, 2ND_B{CEu5S} "_", AN§AIAH REEDY Layonwgk' 'a= aamaswanz ,w-_< V.a £$MfiALQRE~55Q:0é3$2 _ = i 3*' .=A1_ s». ;:§ smmxwxommx {fly Mia samrfixbg fiEGBE_A$SDCI$$ES ma gangs; K:Rax=$HETwy,gAnvs., ) up...------- 1 SEATE 0? Kganamnfla'; =_, R2PaEsENwmn"aY'Iws=SECRETARK REvENfiE"nEFARTmExm " ' ..... .. V ':_aANaaLag£+§5Q_ao1 2 fH$ ccaMi$sic$2g DE?AREM®NT*QFAENBQWNMEfiTS L"'= mEHAfl$SHWkR_EHAVAfl, %_ --cuaAJ?Eg, *~f~¢fiANQALOREh18 '.3«.THm»$EEcxAL nzpvmy comxssxomma 1, _3A$GALORE nzswazcm, "._KRISHI EHAVAN, K.G. RQAD, . E&fiG&LORE -2- 4 AssxsmANm comzssxonma MUZARAI wnxxs, coapoaawxon ARE& 329 rnooa, panzum BEOCK VESHfiESHWARAIAH mowmns, aAxeALoaE~5se 001. ~W"~. ; _. ». -J: » 1. ..;;Ra$9omn£Nms.,_ {BY Sxi N KUMAR HCGP *. 1 " V3,'. ~'.'- THIS w.?. FILEE Phgyxxa $0; guasaifiag sexism aw. 25.4.2007 Eassan Ex *$HE $Eccx3 VRESPONDENE Vina ANNEX.A. QUASH raE¢ ognmn *32. }25.4.2ae? aassmn BY R2 vInE'AmNEx;s;»; * "" wars wax? pmwmxxew uemzxe UN $03 PRELIMIRARE BEARING xx 3,w GRQfl9_EH1S'DA3} ins COflRT MADE THE E0LLQWXNG; Wa". i '=-."T=.' V ;,£hQTp§tifi;¢né%Léfihmit5§that he was apyointad as }B&shk%i' [in i§é-- fiadxe of Seaend Diviaion Clerk *t§ $fi_xfinfi%3%$a Swamy Tempie, Bangalore Sg§£h.¥alfik. V Tfie salary 0f the petitioner was ' §éin§E §&$d fra the tample fund till 19?4. A= her%@ffiefiH the semwnd respandant infarmad tha Athird"i§$pondent that a 'yaahkar' is nah a V". Govéxfimmnt fiexvant. Ax yer the said u xgémmmnimatian, the benefitfi granted to the Epetitionex was withdrawn. subsequently, the ...3- Enfimmwent Coxrnzisaioner by zneans cf an oréezgf dated 29w?w1986 created a clerk post on a» m§n¢h1y galaxy of Rs.450/--. The said i--1953 "zzzzmzezscaa-ssfully challenged by the-*";:zréf;£.*:t:'i£§ne.§r "by filing W? No.1G723/1996. Ehagaéffiéx the st§£g by" order dated 4w12«1997:_san¢t;§ned _:a¢f:$ca;é" gs? Suaczcmd. Qivision C3.ez'3C"V'v"g_'V"" "th§'.3 ' 'i:.S;ta'fl.3»??t1!eHx?. The Endowment Cenmi.sf:si:§,«pne4ié""'_'V' "~h«;'.s ' <:¥x<EiV. er dated 5--6»-2004 re-fixe::1"1:;1s¢é.=. éiafirQc»fi.:_ 'i;ii¢ _'petitianar from 1974 fin tpeQ§¢ax§f$§j$e§é§¢,§i§i§1on Ci&xk. Wham thinga gté¢d=®@fisQ,§a_§s%§~:aa7 iAnnexuremA}, a notgée "came §£m h§ igéaad by the Endnwmant C:m:t§S.--5sfli;.m:§erVV -. _ t,~3:m~' patitimner ahould re--gay Ra ;,a§}32a/e . weiag tha finanaial benefits ggtaaaaa t&"~%im within saven days. mhe ' ;.V:§t'97§;iVt'iiEifii€%§3% --ha.:s mam produced Annexuxrems the mrcler A-;'»Z*{Lji*_'a«~VAlci¢;xi§fV1 fram the date sf rec.*:e.:§€..;;:ut.v. 'Ifixa secsanci respondent
an consider the same
and pa.f3«s V orflera within arm math
the@r_:eofV’.L””~V VfI’i*:ae_’v–;:>:.1Te’:r .
Sd/-
Judge