High Court Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Jafar Ali vs State on 17 July, 2009

Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Jafar Ali vs State on 17 July, 2009
                                   // 1 //

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
          AT PRINCIPAL SEAT, JODHPUR

                     ORDER
                       In
 S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.3444/2009

          {Jafar Ali Versus The State of
          Rajasthan}

         Date of Order ::: 17th July, 2009

                      PRESENT
     HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN

Shri Vijay Jain, counsel for the petitioner
Shri Anil Joshi, PP for the State of Rajasthan
                      ####


By the Court:
          Heard            learned           counsel          for      the

petitioner(s)            as     well         as     learned         Public

Prosecutor         and    perused        the      relevant     material

made available to me during the arguments of the

case.

          It        is     contended         on     behalf        of   the

petitioner         that        petitioner          is    in    judicial

custody since 10th June, 2009; the investigation

is complete and charge-sheet has been filed;

there is a delay in lodging the F.I.R. as

incident took place on 16th April, 2009, whereas

the F.I.R. was lodged on 19th May, 2009 i.e. more

than after a month, therefore, the accused

petitioner be released on bail.

After considering the submissions of

learned counsel for the parties, examining the

record and the facts and circumstances of the
// 2 //

case, but without expressing any opinion on its

merits and demerits, I think it fit and proper

to allow this application under Section 439,

Cr.P.C. Hence, it is directed that accused-

petitioner Jafar Ali S/o Nasir Ali be released

on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in F.I.R. No.

267/2009, Police Station Hanumangarh Junction,

District Hanumangarh registered under Section(s)

380 IPC, provided he furnishes a personal bond

in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five

Thousand only) together with one surety of the

like amount to the satisfaction of the trial

court for his appearance before that Court on

all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when

called upon to do so.

(NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN), J.

//DK//