High Court Karnataka High Court

Jagadish vs The State By Najarbad on 2 September, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Jagadish vs The State By Najarbad on 2 September, 2010
Author: Subhash B.Adi
,.1,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DA'I'ED THIS THE 2"' DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 201Q.. _

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE SUB}-{ASH  'T   e.

CRIMINAL PETITION    

BETWEEN:

1. Jagadish

S / o Thimmegowda  .

Aged 45 years ' '_ «. .
No.803, Rajkumar RUad- "  ; 

9"? Cross, Yaragana1)_aI1i._V vv
Mysore.    

2. Javeed.FaL:3halL_..  '

S / o Bab J ar1_,
Age.d._.45V"3teé1r'S;.__, _ ._
Nc5.302';e'Iif1é?_VB1c;;k  
Ba.nni'manta§j2,, H;1dQo"~-- .. '
W Stage, MyS01fe,._ __ 

3. Abdul  Rah'ma;';--_ _
V, . }S / on .Aha1'ried_VHussa1in
- iiflgbyears. No.5'Q;--2"d Cross

  K..E...I:$.CAO1pny. Udayagiri

"  

4. A» "Nisar'Ah1::'}.ed
 S/ Iqbal Ahmed
2.8 years. No. 1006.
..  Sanmarga, Siddarthanagar
" «- Mysore. . . . .PETI'i'IONERS

(By Sri.N.V.Prakash 8: Assts., Advs.}



AND:

The State by Najarbad
Police Station
Mysore. . . . RESPONDENT

(By SI’i.Satish R.Gi1ji, HCGP)

TEEIS CRIMINAL PE’l’I’i’ION IS FILED UND$Rll”SEC:’Fi£§Nl 48,2 V’
CR.P.C PRAYING THA’l’ THIS HoN’BL1′; conm’ ‘MAY i3vE”PLE1XSEjD ‘

SET ASIDE THE FIR AND COMPl,A;lNT,_-A-FILED,’ ‘A.GA1’Ns3?__.
Pi3TI’i’IONER BY RESPONDENT POL-ICE. ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘

THIS PETl’l’IOi\i COMING ONVEOR o.ao_ERS,:’rHi’sV”‘oAr; THE”.

COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: _ _’

in .vlcl1tiestion the proceedings in
Crime No.i96–,./3010.registered. by Nazarabad police, Mysore City

on 13.g7.201OlforV tl1e’–oifence punishable under Section 379 of

I-‘i’lll’the1i$cl; A. ———-

.2: “lCl3elplla,rtment of Mines and Geology has lodged a

coniplaintv. dlia alleging that, the petitioner along with 9

– lorries were involved in collecting and removing the sand illegally

“a.”rid_ yfigiothout valid licence. On getting the information, the

.,._ll,H:Qon?1plainant and the police went to the spot and seized the

uijlorries. As against registration of the complaint, this petition has

been filed. ‘ –

_,3_,

Prima facie the allegation discloses the alleged offence and
the matter is under investigation. I find no ground to interfere.

Petition dismissed.

=a=Ap/_