IN THE HIGH coum' OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED 1'1-us THE 313' DAY OF MAY 2011
BEFORE :
THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE M0HAN>AASlf!ANT;l\NA:G0'UE:)AR u
WRIT PETITION No.7183/;2_Ql&1;,\{A.§Me+§§ES")"'
Between :
Jagannath Hegde,
S/0 Harihara Hegde
Aged about 50 years,
No.19, 155 Cross, '
K.v.Lane, Cottomaet;-._ A
Bangalore----53._V Petitioner
( By Sri Asfmk 'i&d\}pcfate)
And 1
1. Author;s;'ed_%'c>.ffi'¢e_r;>_ "
State Bank o,f'Inre--11. .. Respondents
Q Sr: N.Ss.;ryaprakash, Advocate for R-1)
*2-
This Writ Petition is fiied under Articies 226 of
the Constitution of India praying to quash theH__imVpu_c_;.ned
order dated10.1.2011 vide Anne><ure–A unri_er"'vSecti-o__n'
SARB/VJP/2965(312) 29? issued by the autnorésejdofficeer
State of India SARB Bangalore~56O O02, ao'ti*io—rised'=.officer,"'V
State Bank of India, SARB, Bangalote-O'2;,«atn-d etc;
This Writ Petition coming on preliminary' »hea'r–tng,':Vi'r:._VV
'B' group this day, the Court made the*-folllowigrxg
Petitioner has soootati the notice vide
Annexu re~' A' dated _ *respondent–Bank
which was elxergilse conferred under
Section 13(:t.2) and Reconstruction of
Financiai $Veen_rityilélnforcement Interest Act,
2002, reladxlwith’ Interest (Enforcement)
Rules,2.002.i”Si_nc’e..the’*.petitioner has got an alternative and
r”‘8medYiV””o’fiV ai3Deal under Section 17 of the
Court declines to entertain the writ
petitioén. _
*:._’Peti’tion fails and accordingly, the same stands
‘_’_Ar’~__of£st:2i;ssed; It is open for the petitioner to approach the
5/”:
s’
Appettate Authority under Sectian 1? of the SURFAESI Act
within four weeks from this day,
gag}: . ‘.
A x
*bk/
