High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Jagdeep Singh @ Raja vs State Of Punjab on 3 September, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Jagdeep Singh @ Raja vs State Of Punjab on 3 September, 2009
Criminal Misc. No. M-20361 of 2009                      1


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH

                               Criminal Misc. No. M-20361 of 2009
                               Date of decision: September 03, 2009


Jagdeep Singh @ Raja                 -Petitioner

            Versus

State of Punjab                      -Respondent
Coram       Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta

Present:    Mr. BS Bhalla, Advocate, for the petitioner.
            Mr. Shilesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab.

Rajan Gupta, J.(Oral)


This is a petition for grant of bail in a case registered against

the petitioner under Sections 452,354,376,511 IPC at police station

Sidhwan Bet, Ludhiana vide FIR No. 161 dated 4.11.2008.

Mr. Bhalla submits that the petitioner was granted bail for

offences under Sections 452 & 354 IPC. However, on a supplementary

statement recorded by the police later, Sections 376 & 511 IPC were added,

due to which bail bonds furnished by the petitioner were not accepted. Mr.

Bhalla further submits that in the supplementary statement the only

allegation levelled by the prosecutrix is that the petitioner made an attempt

to commit rape upon her. Learned counsel has emphasized that in the

supplementary statement the prosecutrix has improved her version.

Learned State counsel (on the instructions from SI Gurcharn

Singh, who is present in Court) submits that the allegations against the

petitioner are serious in nature and thus he does not deserve the concession

of bail. He, however, admits that the statement of the prosecutrix has been
Criminal Misc. No. M-20361 of 2009 2

recorded by the trial court.

Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case at this

stage, however, keeping in view the period of incarceration already

undergone by the petitioner as also the fact that the trial may take a

considerable time to conclude, the instant petition is allowed and the

petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Ludhiana.

[Rajan Gupta]
Judge
September 03, 2009.

‘ask’