Jagdish & 14 Ors. P.I.L. vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Revenue & 9 … on 10 May, 2010

Chief Justice's Court

Case :- MISC. BENCH No. - 1818 of 2004

Petitioner :- Jagdish & 14 Ors. P.I.L.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Revenue & 9 Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Sharad Kr. Srivastava,Suresh Chandra Shukla
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,R.N. Gupta

Hon'ble Amitava Lala,Acting Chief Justice
Hon'ble Shabihul Hasnain,J.

None appeared to press the writ petition in spite of repeated calls.
It seems that the writ petition has become infructuous by the
passage of time, as such the petitioner has lost interest.

Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous without
imposing any cost.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

Order Date :- 10.5.2010
MAA