Jagdishbhai vs Mohemmed on 14 September, 2010

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CA/7361/2010	 2/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION-FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY No. 7361 of 2010
 

In


 

FIRST
APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER) No. 5547 of 2009
 

 
For
Approval and Signature:  
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT
 
 
=========================================================


 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To
			be referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

 
=========================================================


 

JAGDISHBHAI
SOMABHAI BAROT   Applicant 

 

Versus
 

MOHEMMED
HANIF KHURSID AHMED MAKRANI & 2 - Respondents
 

=========================================================
Appearance : 
MR
MTM HAKIM for
Applicant : 1, 
None for Respondents : 1 - 2. 
MR SUNIL B PARIKH
for Respondents :
3, 
=========================================================


 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 14/09/2010 

 

ORAL
JUDGMENT

The
applicant has preferred this application under Section 5 of the
Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay of 45 days occurred in
preferring the First Appeal.

Heard
learned advocates for the parties. Looking to the averments made in
this application, delay of 45 days occurred in preferring the First
Appeal is sufficiently explained. The averments made in this
application have remained uncontroverted.

In
view of this, the delay deserves to be condoned and is accordingly
condoned. Application is allowed. Rule is made absolute. Office is
directed to place the First Appeal for admission hearing in due
course.

(S.R.BRAHMBHATT,
J.)

pallav

Top