In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Crl. Misc. No. M- 5579 of 2009
Date of Decision:March 10, 2009
Jagtar Singh @ Pappi Brar and others
---Petitioner
versus
Raja Singh
---Respondent
Coram: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
***
Present: Mr.Iqbal S.Mann,Advocate,
for the petitioner
Mr.Navdeep Chhabra, Advocate,
for the respondent.
***
SABINA, J.
Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 438 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.’) seeking
anticipatory bail in complaint No. 56-1 dated 4.4.2007 titled as “Raja
Singh vs. Jagtar Singh and others” under Sections 323, 336, 506/34 of the
Indian Penal Code and Section 3(III) (X) of the Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes Act, 1989.
Complainant-Raja Singh has filed a complaint against the
petitioners alleging that on 3.4.2007 at about 8.30 a.m. he was attacked by
Crl. Misc. No. M- 5579 of 2009 -2-
the petitioners in front of many other person and he was abused by the
petitioners.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the
complainant was, in fact, breaking the pipe, which is to be maintained by
the panchayat, to give connection to the house of Resham Singh. An
application was moved by Baljit Singh-petitioner No. 3 to S.H.O., Police
Station, Muktsar in this regard. When he came to know that the illegal act
was being committed, he went to the spot and stopped the said persons
from making illegal water connection and he also gave information to the
panchayat in this regard that Raja Singh etc. who were making illegal
connection, had insulted him. The said application is dated 3.4.2007
Learned counsel for the respondent, on the other hand has
submitted that the petitioners had attacked the complainant in front of other
person and had also insulted him as he is a scheduled caste.
The fact that whether the respondent was making an illegal
water connection out of the water pipe, which is being maintained by the
panchayat along with others or whether the present complaint has been filed
due to the said reason, would more appropriately be gone into and
considered during trial. The possibility that the petitioners have been
falsely involved in this case due to the complaint made by petitioner No. 2
to the Police (Annexure P-3) at this stage, cannot be ruled out.
Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of
the case, this petition is allowed. Petitioners are directed to surrender before
the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Muktsar on or before 17.3.2009, the date
Crl. Misc. No. M- 5579 of 2009 -3-
fixed before it, and the said court shall release the petitioners on bail
subject to its satisfaction.
(SABINA)
JUDGE
March 10, 2009
PARAMJIT