High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Jai Krishan Singh vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 3 March, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Jai Krishan Singh vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 3 March, 2011
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CWJC No.9815 of 2010
                 1. JAI KRISHAN SINGH S/O LATE HARKHU SINGH R/O VILL.-
                 MAHUCHAK, P.S.- RAJAUNM, DISTT.- BANKA
                                            Versus
                 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH SECRETARY
                 DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, PATNA, BIHAR
                 2. THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PATNA, BIHAR
                 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUNGER
                 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION,
                 MUNGER
                 5. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,
                 MUNGER
                 6. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, MUNGER
                 7. HEADMISTRESS, R.B. HIGH SCHOOL, JAMALPUR, MUNGER
                                        -----------

02. 3.3.2011 There is no dispute that the petitioner was in

judicial custody in relation to Rajoun P S Case No. 103 of 2009

which was a case registered under section 302/34 of the Indian

Penal Code against unknown persons. Subsequently he was

released on bail by the High Court, which is evident from

Anneuxre-3.

The reason for filing the writ application is because

the petitioner happens to be an Assistant Teacher and was/is

posted at R B High School, Jamalpur, Munger. Now after release

on bail he is not being permitted to join nor any decision is being

taken by the concerned respondent as to his status.

According to the counsel for the petitioner, even if

the petitioner was deemed to have been under suspension after

being taken in judicial custody for more than 48 hours, since his

release appropriate order will have to be passed under the rules.

He cannot be treated as a non-identity or persona non grata.

Since the issue has been raked up by the petitioner
2

for more than a year ago and the respondents are silent on the

issue, the writ applications is disposed of with a direction upon

the District Superintendent of Education, Munger that taking

cognizance of the facts and circumstances noted above in the

earlier part of the order, a decision with regard to the status of the

petitioner will be taken within six weeks from the date of

receipt/production of a copy of this order. If there is any breach of

the direction, respondent no.4 will be apapropriately dealt with.

The writ application is disposed of with above

direction.

rkp                             (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)