C.W.P.No. 17844 of 2004. 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH.
C.W.P.No. 17844 of 2004.
Date of Decision : 26.11.2008.
Jai Narain and others
Petitioners.
VERSUS
State of Haryana and others.
Respondents.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH.
---
Present:- Mr. Shailendra Jain, Advocate, for
the petitioner(s).
Ms. Palika Monga, Assistant Advocate
General, Haryana.
Mr. R.S.Longia, Advocate, for
Mr. Arun Walia, Advocate, for HUDA.
---
1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be
allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the
digest?
M.M.KUMAR,J.
The petitioners have prayed for quashing
notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land
Acquisition Act, 1894 on 14.8.2003 (Annexure P-2) and
10.4.2004(Annexure P-9). Their principal ground of challenge
is that they have raised ‘A’ class residential houses. The
construction is, however, admitted to be class ‘B’ and is
conceded to be raised before Section 4 notification is almost
C.W.P.No. 17844 of 2004. 2
all the cases. The Director Urban Estate, Haryana has
submitted his report dated 26.9.2008 which is available on
the file of C.W.P.No. 14769 of 2006.
Learned counsel for the petitioners state that as
per instructions given to him land of all the petitioners
stand released from acquisition in accordance with the
recommendation made by the Director because there are built
up area on the land. However, it is pointed out that in the
report of the Director, some of the names have not been
correctly mentioned which would not make difference for the
purpose of disposal of the writ petition. According to the
report of the Director, the proportionate area has also been
released from acquisition which would amount to the area
equivalent to the constructed released area.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(M.M.KUMAR )
JUDGE
26.11.2008 ( JORA SINGH)
Anoop JUDGE