High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Jai Narayan Gupta @ Jag Narayain … vs The State Of Bihar on 21 October, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Jai Narayan Gupta @ Jag Narayain … vs The State Of Bihar on 21 October, 2011
                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                       Cr.Misc. No.32946 of 2011
                  Jai Narayain Gupta @ Jag Narayain Gupta, Son of Late Munna Saw
                  resident of mohalla-Gupta Market, Raja Bazar, P.S.-Shashtri Nagar, Dist.-
                  Patna
                                                    Versus
                  The State Of Bihar
                                                 -----------

02 21.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Supplementary affidavit has been filed.

The petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection

with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 196,

465, 466, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code, is named accused in

this case with allegation of using some forged and fabricated

documents in Title Suit Eviction No. 09 of 2004 decided by Munsif-II,

Patna on 19th November, 2008 after subsequent enquiry under Section

340 of the Cr.P.C. in Cr. Misc. No. 09 of 2009 by the said court.

Submission is that in the entire decision of original suit,

there is no whisper of any such document being forged and fabricated.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in

the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four

weeks, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on

furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two

sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Ravi Ranjan,

Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna in connection with Complaint

Case No. 794(C) of 2011 subject to condition laid down under Section

438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code with additional condition to

remain physically present before the court below on each and every
2

date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is

earlier, in case of failure on two consecutive dates, without giving any

reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be

cancelled.

SHAHZAD                            ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)