High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Jailesh Paswan @ Suresh Paswan vs The State Of Bihar on 27 April, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Jailesh Paswan @ Suresh Paswan vs The State Of Bihar on 27 April, 2011
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Cr.Misc. No.8641 of 2011
            JAILESH PASWAN @ SURESH PASWAN, SON OF LAGE FAGO
            PASWAN
                                            Versus
                                 THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                          -----------

2. 27.4.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner was refused bail by an order dated

2.7.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. 17245 of 2010 stating that it was

being rejected at this stage.

Considering the same, let the petitioner above

named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to

the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in

Garhpura P.S. Case No. 38 of 2009 subject to the following

conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of

the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to

how he is related with the petitioner and the other shall be the

wife of the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish

information to the Court about any change in address of the

petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he

will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in

any other case of similar nature after his release in the present

case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate

the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse.
2

(iii)That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will

receive the police papers on the given date and be present on

date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates

and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be

well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two

consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

( Anjana Prakash, J.)
S.Ali