High Court Kerala High Court

Jaison Joseph vs The Station House Officer on 7 November, 2008

Kerala High Court
Jaison Joseph vs The Station House Officer on 7 November, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 4237 of 2008()


1. JAISON JOSEPH, AGED 37 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAJAPURAM
                       ...       Respondent

2. ANEES THOMAS, W/O.THOMAS, PERUKAROTT

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :07/11/2008

 O R D E R
                           R. BASANT, J.
             -------------------------------------------------
                   Crl.M.C. No. 4237 of 2008
             -------------------------------------------------
          Dated this the 7th day of November, 2008

                                ORDER

The petitioner faces allegations in a crime registered

alleging offences punishable, inter alia, under Secs.452 and

324 IPC. In the course of investigation, allegation under

Sec.308 IPC has also been included. According to the

petitioner, the inclusion of the allegation under Sec.308 IPC is

totally unjustified. On fanciful allegations that charge has been

included in the crime. Injury is on the chest. It is allegedly

inflicted with a knife.

2. I shall not embark on a more detailed discussion

invoking the jurisdiction under Sec.482 Cr.P.C. I am not, at

this stage of the proceedings, able to hazard an opinion as to

whether the inclusion of the offence under Sec.308 IPC is

justified or not.

Crl.M.C. No. 4237 of 2008 -: 2 :-

3. The petitioner, if he thinks he is entitled to the same,

must seek anticipatory bail from the competent court. In the

alternative, he has to surrender before the Investigating

Officer or the learned Magistrate and then seek regular bail.

No directions under Sec.482 Cr.P.C. incorporating a

pronouncement on the validity of the inclusion of the allegation

under Sec.308 IPC does appear to be necessary or possible at

this stage.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner may be permitted to surrender before the learned

Magistrate and seek regular bail. The learned Magistrate may

be directed to consider the application for anticipatory bail on

merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously as directed by

this Court in Alice George v. Deputy Superintendent of

Police (2003 (1) KLT 339).

5. Needless to say, if the petitioner surrenders before the

learned Magistrate and seeks bail, after giving sufficient prior

notice to the Prosecutor in charge of the case, the learned

Magistrate must proceed to pass appropriate orders on merits

and expeditiously in the light of the decision in Alice George.

No special or specific directions appear to be necessary. Every

court must do the same.

Crl.M.C. No. 4237 of 2008 -: 3 :-

6. This Crl.M.C. is, in these circumstances, dismissed with

the above observations.

7. Hand over a copy of this order to the learned counsel for

the petitioner.

Sd/-

(R. BASANT, JUDGE)

Nan/

//true copy//

P.S. to Judge