High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Jasmanpreet Singh & Others vs State Of Punjab & Another on 18 November, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Jasmanpreet Singh & Others vs State Of Punjab & Another on 18 November, 2009
 CRM No. M-29802 of 2009                                  1



    IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB &
              HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

                               CRM No. M-29802 of 2009 (O&M)
                               Date of decision: 18.11.2009

Jasmanpreet Singh & others                          ...Petitioners

                             Versus

State of Punjab & another                           ...Respondents
CORAM:      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present:    Mr. K.S. Chahal, Advocate, for the petitioners.
            Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab.

Ms. Jigyasa Tanwar, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

Rajan Gupta, J (oral).

The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482

Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.110 dated 10th September, 2009, under

Sections 366, 511, 427, 293, 294, 506 read with Section 34 IPC,

registered at Police Station Sudhar, District Ludhiana Rural, District

Ludhiana (Annexure P-1) and the subsequent proceedings arising

therefrom, on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2) arrived at

between the parties.

Learned counsel for the State has pointed out that keeping

in view the nature of crime, where the petitioners have made obscene

calls to the sister-in-law of the complainant and also tried to follow her

and harassed her on the road and market, some heavy costs need to be

imposed upon them.

CRM No. M-29802 of 2009 2

Under the circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners

undertakes that the petitioners shall remit Rs.30,000/- as compensation

to the complainant and also remit an amount of Rs.10,000/- as costs

incurred by the State after investigating machinery was set into motion

due to registration of FIR.

In facts and circumstances of the case, it will be in the

interest of the parties that FIR in question is quashed. No useful

purpose is likely to be served with continuance of the criminal

proceedings in view of amicable settlement of the same.

In view of the above, the present FIR and the consequent

proceedings deserve to be quashed in the light of the decision of Full

Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of

Punjab, 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052.

Resultantly, the present petition is allowed, the FIR and the

subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed subject to the

petitioners complying with the undertaking aforesaid. The amount of

compensation (Rs.30,000/-) and costs (Rs.10,000/-) will be paid to the

complainant and Punjab State Legal Services Authority respectively by

the petitioners, within a month from the receipt of certified copy of this

order.

A copy of this order be sent to the Punjab State Legal

Services Authority, Chandigarh.

(RAJAN GUPTA)
JUDGE
November 18, 2009
‘rajpal’