High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Jaswant Singh vs State Of Punjab & Another on 27 July, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Jaswant Singh vs State Of Punjab & Another on 27 July, 2009
Crl. Misc. No. M-20146 of 2009                     1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH

                                Criminal Misc. No. M-20146 of 2009
                                Date of decision: July 27, 2009


Jaswant Singh                                -Petitioner

            Versus

State of Punjab & another                    -Respondents
Coram       Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta

Present:    Mr. Ashish Bakshi, Advocate, for the petitioner.


Rajan Gupta, J.(Oral)


This is a petition for anticipatory bail in a complaint case titled

‘Devinder Pal Singh Vs. Jaswant Singh’ pending against the petitioner under

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act before the Court of Judicial

Magistrate Ist Class, Anandpur Sahib. Bail bonds of the petitioner were

cancelled on 15-4-2009 on account of his absence before the Court. The

petitioner thereafter preferred an application for anticipatory bail before the

Sessions Judge, Rup Nagar, which was dismissed on 15-6-2009.

Counsel submits that the petitioner had been regularly

appearing before the Court on all the dates fixed. According to counsel,

absence of the petitioner on 15-4-2009 was un-intentional as his brother had

suddenly fallen ill and he had to attend to him. Counsel submits that the

petitioner undertakes that he shall never default in appearance before the

Court in future.

Under the circumstances, it is directed that in case the

petitioner appears before the trial Court within a week of receipt of certified
Crl. Misc. No. M-20146 of 2009 2

copy of this order, he shall be admitted to bail. This shall, however, be

subject to an undertaking in the shape of an affidavit to be furnished by the

petitioner that he shall not default in appearance before the Court in future.

The trial Court shall be at liberty to impose any other condition deemed fit

in the facts of the case.

With the observations aforesaid, the petition stands disposed

of.

[Rajan Gupta]
Judge
July 27, 2009.

‘ask’