High Court Kerala High Court

Jayan vs State Of Kerala on 13 April, 2007

Kerala High Court
Jayan vs State Of Kerala on 13 April, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 2215 of 2007()


1. JAYAN, VATTATHARA VEEDU,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SAM MATHEW, S/O.JOHN,
3. ABHILASH, S/O.RAGHAVAN,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SHAJI THOMAS PORKKATTIL

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :13/04/2007

 O R D E R
                              V.RAMKUMAR, J.

                              ----------------------------

                        Bail Application No. 2215/2007

                              -----------------------------

                       Dated this  13th day of April, 2007


                                    O R D E R

The petitioners who are accused Nos. 2 to 4 in Crime

No.130/2007 of Pathanamthitta police station for an offence

punishable under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act for allegedly

having been found in possession of 19 litres of rectified spirit on

14.2.2007 and who were arrested on the same day seek their

enlargement on bail.

2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and

the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Having regard to the nature of the offences and the

other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail

to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to

be released on bail on each of them executing a bond for Rs.

20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) with two solvent

sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the

J.F.C.M-I, Pathanamthitta and subject to the following

conditions:

(a). Petitioners shall report before the

Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11

a.m. on all Wednesdays.

B.A.2215/2007

2

(b). The petitioners shall make himself

available for interrogation as and when

required by the police.

(c). The petitioners shall not influence or

intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall

he attempt to tamper with the evidence for

the prosecution.

(d). The petitioners shall not commit any

offence while on bail.

4. If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above

conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be

cancelled.

The application is allowed as above.

V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE

mrcs

B.A.2215/2007

3