High Court Kerala High Court

Jayan vs The State Of Kerala on 13 August, 2007

Kerala High Court
Jayan vs The State Of Kerala on 13 August, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 4878 of 2007()


1. JAYAN, S/O. GOPALAN ACHARY,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.A.C.DEVY

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :13/08/2007

 O R D E R
                            R.BASANT, J
                   = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                       B.A.No.4878 of 2007
                  = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

               Dated this the 13th day of August, 2007

                               ORDER

Application for regular bail. The petitioner is the 2nd accused.

He faces allegations, inter alia under Sec.397 read with 34 IPC.

Altogether there are six accused persons. The crux of the

allegations is that on 17.4.07 at about 11.30 p.m., the accused

persons committed robbery in furtherance of their common

intention and forcibly took away articles worth Rs.1,14,250/-(gold

ornaments, mobile phone, wrist watch etc.) from the defacto

complainant and his wife who were travelling on a two wheeler.

The petitioner was arrested in some other crime and he allegedly

made confession statement and his arrest was recorded for this

crime on 26.5.07. He continues in custody from that date. The

learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the petitioner may be

now released on bail now. He is absolutely innocent, it is

submitted.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the application

vehemently. He points out that sufficient data has already been

collected which point to the complicity of the petitioner. The

B.A.No.4878 of 2007 2

allegations are grave. Investigation is in progress. The petitioner

has criminal antecedents. He is involved in many other crimes also.

Regular bail may not be granted to the petitioner at this stage,

submits the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Having considered all the relevant inputs I find merit in the

opposition by the learned Public Prosecutor and I am satisfied this is

a fit case where the Investigators must be given reasonable further

time to complete the investigation.

4. In the result, this petition is dismissed. I may however,

hasten to observe that the petitioner shall be at liberty to move this

court or the Sessions court for bail again at a later stage of the

investigation not, at any rate, prior to 25/08/2007. The police shall,

in the meantime, make every endeavour to complete the

investigation. Needless to say, if the charge sheet is not filed within

the stipulated time the option for the petitioner to move for default

bail shall remain unfettered by the dismissal of this petition.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
sj
/TRUE COPY/

P.A.TO JUDGE