High Court Kerala High Court

Jayanathavalli.S vs The Manager on 13 October, 2010

Kerala High Court
Jayanathavalli.S vs The Manager on 13 October, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 31335 of 2010(N)


1. JAYANATHAVALLI.S.,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE MANAGER, SOUTH INDIAN BANK,
                       ...       Respondent

2. AUTHORISED OFFICER, SOUTH INDIAN BANK,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.VINOD KUMAR.C

                For Respondent  :SRI.K.K.JOHN,SC,SOUTH INDIAN BANK

The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.K.ABDUL REHIM

 Dated :13/10/2010

 O R D E R
                    C. K. ABDUL REHIM, J.
              =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
                  W.P.(C) No. 31335 of 2010
              =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
          Dated this the 13th day of October, 2010

                          JUDGMENT

Consequent to default committed in repayment of a

housing loan availed by the petitioner from the respondent

Bank, coercive steps under the SARFAESI Act was initiated

against immovable property of the petitioner, which is the

secured asset. Ext.P1 is the notice issued intimating steps

with respect to taking over possession of the property.

2. According to the petitioner, her husband was

seriously ill and he died on 22-5-2010. She had spent huge

amounts for his treatment. On receipt of Ext.P1, the

petitioner had approached the respondents with a request

to permit her to pay off the defaulted amounts, in order to

regularize the account. According to her, the respondents

are not taking note of such request and is proceeding with

coercive steps. Hence this writ petition.

3. Heard Mr. K.K. John learned counsel appearing for

the respondents. It is submitted that if the petitioner pays

W.P.(C) No.31335/2010 2

the entire defaulted amount within a short time, she can be

permitted to continue payment of future instalments as per

the original schedule.

4. Under the above circumstances, this writ petition is

disposed of directing the petitioner to remit the entire

defaulted amount with interest and expenses if any due,

within a period of one month from today. If the petitioner

remits the entire defaulted amount as directed above, the

respondents will permit her to continue payment of future

monthly instalments in accordance with the original

schedule.

It is made clear that on the event of default, the

respondents will be free to proceed with further steps

pursuant to the notice already issued.

C. K. ABDUL REHIM,
JUDGE.

mn.