Jayant vs Nagar on 21 August, 2008

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/6421/1987	 1/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6421 of 1987
 

 
 
For
Approval and Signature:  
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA  Sd/-
 

  
HONOURABLE
MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI
Sd/- 
 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To be
			referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

 
=========================================================


 

JAYANT
EXTRACTION IND.PVT.LTD & 1 - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

NAGAR
PALIKA OF BEDI & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
Appearance : 
MR
NANDISH CHUDGAR FOR NANAVATI ASSOCIATES for Petitioner(s). 
MR PV
HATHI for Respondent(s) : 1, 
NOTICE SERVED for Respondent(s) :
2, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI
		
	

 

Date
: 21/08/2008 

 

ORAL
JUDGMENT

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA)

Mr.

Nandish Chudgar, learned Advocate for the petitioner states that he
has no instructions as regards the latest developments. Considering
the fact that the dispute relates to the rate of octroi duty levied
by respondent Nagar Palika and the fact that the octroi has since
been abolished with effect from 01.05.2001, in the circumstances, the
Court does not find it necessary to enter into any discussion on
merits of the controversy. The petition is accordingly disposed of.
Rule discharged. Interim relief stands vacated. There shall be no
order as to costs.

 Sd/-				Sd/-
 

      
        (D.A.Mehta,
J.)     (H.N.Devani,J.)
 

 


 

M.M.BHATT
 

 



    

 
	   
      
      
	    
		      
	   
      
	  	    
		   Top