IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 15671 of 2008(N)
1. JAYARAM.T.P, HEAD CLERK, POVERTY
... Petitioner
Vs
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS
... Respondent
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT
3. THE SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER,
4. BOBBAN, HEAD CLERK, KAZHAKKUTTOM BLOCK,
5. ANITHA RANI, HEAD CLERK,
6. ABDUL NISSAR, HEAD CLERK, CHIRAYINKEEZHU
7. RAJASREE, HEAD CLERK, NEDUMANGADU BLOCK,
For Petitioner :SRI. D.KISHORE
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI
Dated :27/05/2008
O R D E R
V.GIRI,J.
-------------------------
W.P ( C) No. 15671 of 2008
--------------------------
Dated this the 27th May, 2008
J U D G M E N T
Aggrieved by Exhibit P5 order of transfer, the petitioner
has preferred an appeal in terms of the guidelines, before the
Government as per Exhibit P6. Learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that there is no reason why the petitioner
should be transferred from Trivandrum to Malappuram and at
any rate, even if, a transfer was inevitable, a nearer station
could have been chosen. Reference is made in Exhibit P6
regarding retention of other persons in the same station.
Having perused the averments in the writ petition as also
Exhibit P6 and having heard the learned counsel for the
petitioner and learned Government Pleader, the writ petition is
disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass
orders on Exhibit P6 within a period of four weeks from the date
of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
(V.GIRI, JUDGE)
ma