. _ 1 _ IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEM:I?:ER; THE HON'BLE MR.JU:§'fioE* Nil'_\_N§A'i\$fi)I'\,'.,u'VV4V, CRIMINAL PETITI_ON No;i4324/20.10 ' V BETWEEN: M 'V V V. . Jayram ' S/o.I\/Iadhu Naika 7 Aged about 23 years _ __ to -' R/a suraga, Jéikkariahaliiei _ V_ I Bannerghatta it Anekal 'Fa1u'1:_ ' - A A Bang'a1ore i "i » ~ x ...PETITiONER [By-Srfi M'.i\rIo1A1a~ii Kimiéx, Adv.) ' :AN.D:». " it The Karnataka By I-xléiiagur police station. " ...RESPONDENT
‘(;’3},}:”Sri Vijay Kumar Majage, HCGP)
This Crl.P is flied under Section 439 Cr.P.C
‘ praying to enlarge the petitioner on ‘oaii in Cr.No.63/O9
of Halagur P.S., Mandya District, which is registered for
the offence punishable under Section 392 of IPC.
44_2Vvv
This petition coming on for orders this the
Court made the following:
_ Petitioner is arrayed as .ac’ct’1:;.efld’..A No.1′ in Crime
No.63/2009 registered for an ofien1ceA.puriishab1’e
Section 392 of IPC.
2. Heard the :ea;_.’:n¢a.g petitioner and
the learned Go’ve_rnme”rit Piea’der__ have been taken
through theVi1iV’e’s.tigation’ records.
3. , inVe4st.iga:tion records would reveal that
eifigiorier is “‘inv_o_1ved in several ro er offences
‘ §)7unishablVe.i1n_der Sections 392 and 395 of IPC. In the
‘case on hand, petitioner was responsible for committing
decoitfof Innova car bearing registration No.KA.4}./ M
A 51′ ” and later transporting the same to Maharastra for
,, igeirig Sold there. iv: &Q«*’€/,\_/,’¢,\,,i,..,.:«.C2,’,L
_ 3 ilii
4. Considering the existence of prima facie case
against petitioner and his antecedents, at this stagehe
cannot be granted bail. Accordingly,
dismissed.
I138.