High Court Kerala High Court

Jibin P.B vs The Additional Director General … on 16 September, 2010

Kerala High Court
Jibin P.B vs The Additional Director General … on 16 September, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 27063 of 2010(G)


1. JIBIN P.B, S/O P.R.BOSE, AGED 28 YEARS
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF
                       ...       Respondent

2. MOHAMMED FAISAL, SUPERINTENDENT OF

3. ANIL KUMAR, OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF

4. KANNAN, ASI,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.DENIZEN KOMATH

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI

 Dated :16/09/2010

 O R D E R
      THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ.
                       - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                       W.P.(C).No.27063 OF 2010
                 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                Dated this the 16th day of September, 2010

                                 JUDGMENT

Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.

Petitioner, who claims to be an eye witness in a particular

incident which has been recorded as an offence, is before us. He

alleges threat and duress of the police officials, who are now

investigating the case. It appears that under directions of first

respondent, the Additional Director General of Police, the case in

question and another ultimately went to the CB-CID. This court had

also recorded that fact while disposing of W.P.(C)No.20545/2009. The

cases are registered and reported to the Judicial Magistrate of First

Class, North Paravur. If there is any allegation of harassment or any

other related matters, it should necessarily be available to a person

arrayed as a witness in the case to move the said Magistrate for

appropriate protective orders. In our view, it would not be wise for this

court to act on different versions and pass orders. The Criminal Court

has to ensure the rights of the accused as well as the rights of the

WPC.No.27063/2010 2

witnesses and that their personal liberties are properly protected in

terms of the circumstances and the laws. Preserving all such remedies

of the petitioner, this writ petition is closed.

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,JUDGE

P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE

sv.

WPC.No.27063/2010 3