Gujarat High Court High Court

Jilanimiya vs State on 23 December, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Jilanimiya vs State on 23 December, 2010
Author: Z.K.Saiyed,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/7949/2010	 2/ 3	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 7949 of 2010
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

JILANIMIYA
KACHANMIYA SAIYED & 2 - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
ASHISH M DAGLI for
Applicant(s) : 1 - 3. 
MR AJ DESAI, APP for Respondent(s) : 1, 
MR
PY DIVYESHVAR for Respondent(s) :
1, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYED
		
	

 

Date
: 04/08/2010 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER

Leave
to correct the name of applicant No.1 is granted.

The
present application is filed by the applicants under Section 439 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for enlarging them on regular
bail in connection with the offence being CR No. I 35 of 2010
registered with Viramgam Town Police Station, Dist. Ahmedabad, for
the offences u/s. 143, 147, 148, 149, 325, 307 of I.P. Code and
section 25(1)(b)(a) of the Arms Act.

Heard
learned Advocate for the applicants and learned A.P.P. for the
respondent – State. Learned Advocate for the applicants has
contended that the injuries sustained by the witnesses are
absolutely simple in nature. He has contended that the applicants
are falsely involved in the alleged commission of offence. I have
also perused the papers produced before me. Learned APP has
vehemently opposed this application. However, both the parties do
not press for any reasoned order.

Having
heard the learned Counsel for both the sides and looking to the
facts and circumstances of the case, statement of the witnesses,
gravity of the offence and quantum of punishment, I am inclined to
grant bail to the applicants.

Considering
the above, this Application is allowed. The applicants are ordered
to be released on bail in connection with CR No. I – 35 of 2010
registered with Viramgam Town Police Station, Dist. Ahmedabad, for
the offences alleged against them in this application on executing a
Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each with one solvent
surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and
subject to the conditions that they shall –

a) not
take undue advantage of their liberty or abuse their liberty;

b) not
to try to tamper or pressurize the prosecution witnesses or
complainant in any manner;

c) maintain
law and order and shall cooperate the Investigating Officers;

d) not
act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

e) not
leave the country without the prior permission of the concerned
Sessions Judge.

f) shall
not enter within the territory of Viramgam Taluka except for the
purpose of attending the Court on the date of hearing till the trial
against them is completed.

h) surrender
their passport, if any, to the lower Court within a week.

If
breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the concerned
Sessions Judge will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate
action in the matter.

Bail
before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It would
be open to the trial Court concerned to give time to furnish the
solvency certificate if prayed for.

Rule
is made absolute. Direct service is permitted.

(Z.K.SAIYED,J.)

sas

   

Top