High Court Kerala High Court

Jisha C.S. vs M.G.University Represented By … on 17 November, 2009

Kerala High Court
Jisha C.S. vs M.G.University Represented By … on 17 November, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 32890 of 2009(E)


1. JISHA C.S., D/O.MINI SADHANANDHAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. M.G.UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.B.GANGESH

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.N.RAVINDRAN

 Dated :17/11/2009

 O R D E R
                     P.N.RAVINDRAN, J
                         -------------------
       W.P.(C)s.32890, 32876, 32868 & 32844 of 2009
                        --------------------
          Dated this the 17th day of November, 2009

                         JUDGMENT

The petitioners appeared for the final year B.Com

degree examination conducted by the Mahatma Gandhi

University in April 2009. The results were published on

12.11.2009. The petitioners failed in one paper each. They

have therefore, applied for revaluation of their answer scripts

by submitting Ext.P2 application dated 13.11.2009. It is

submitted that they had done well in the examination and that

they are sure to secure a pass if their answer scripts are

revalued. In these writ petitions, the petitioners seek

expeditious revaluation of their answer scripts.

2. Sri.T.A.Shaji, the learned standing counsel appearing

for the Mahatma Gandhi University submits that if the

petitioners’ applications for revaluation have been filed in

time, the University will take steps to revalue their answer

scripts and communicate results to them expeditiously. In

the light of the said submission, I dispose of these writ

petitions with a direction to the Controller of Examinations,

Mahatma Gandhi University, to take steps to have the

W.P.(C)s.32890/09 & Connected Cases
2

petitioners’ answer scripts described in Ext.P2 application

revalued and to communicate results to them expeditiously

and in any event within eight weeks from the date on which

the petitioners produce a certified copy of this judgment

before him.

P.N.RAVINDRAN,
Judge

mrcs