IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.35210 of 2010
JITENDRA KUMAR SINGH @ JITENDRA SINGH
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
3. 12.10.2010. This matter has come at the instance of
the court.
The order dated 6.10.2010 as pronounced,
did not carry certain grammatical corrections
carried out in the order granting bail and which
has necessitated the present exercise.
Let the order dated 6.10.2010 be modified
to contain the following corrections;
(a) The penal section 393 mentioned in the 4th
line of para-2 at page-1 shall read as
section 323.
(b) The last sentence of the first paragraph at
page 3 shall read as follow:
“He further submits that in no
circumstance, the complainant would like to
distance the petitioner from his ailing
father.”
(C) The second paragraph at page 3 shall read
as follows;
“Having regard to the submissions of the
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner and the complainant as also
2
taking into consideration that the parties
are agreeable for return of matrimonial
harmony, I am of the opinion that the
petitioner can not be kept in incarceration
and should be released forthwith to enable
the parties to return to their matrimonial
home.”
(d) The complaint case number mentioned in
the last page shall read as follows:
“Complaint Case No.250 (C) of 2009.”
Let the order dated 6.10.2010 be modified
to contain the corrections mentioned hereinabove
and be deemed to have been pronounced as such.
Let the present order together with the
order dated 6.10.2010 be communicated by the
office to the court concerned.
(Jyoti Saran, J)
ahk