High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Jitendra Kumar vs State Of Bihar on 12 August, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Jitendra Kumar vs State Of Bihar on 12 August, 2010
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                         Cr.Misc. No.19355 of 2010
                JITENDRA KUMAR S/O RAM KARAN THAKUR
                                   Versus
                             STATE OF BIHAR
                                  -----------

4. 12.08.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under Sections 394/411 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case is that the petitioner was

arrested while he was allegedly driving the vehicle after drugging

the driver. However, during investigation the driver disclosed that

he had been given wine to drink and had become intoxicated, the

petitioner and then started driving vehicle and on hulla people

gathered and arrested them. It is submitted that the petitioner has

no criminal antecedents, which fact will be verified by the

Magistrate before releasing the petitioner on bail by calling for a

report about his antecedent from S.P. Begusarai, since the

petitioner belongs to Begusarai.

In view of such, let the petitioner above named, be

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in

connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 104 of 2010, subject to the

conditions, (i) That one of the bailors will be local in nature since

petitioner belongs to Begusari and the other bailor shall be the

father/brother of the pettioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish

information to the court about any change in the address of the
-2-

petitioner, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner

is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be

released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit

that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated

in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present

case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the

proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iv)

That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the

police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for

charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the

trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for

reasons of misuse, (v) That the petitioner will be well represented

on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his

bail will be liable to be cancelled.

Fahad.                                    ( Anjana Prakash, J. )