IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.14290 of 2010
JITENDRA THAKUR S/O LATE RAGHU THAKUR @ RAGHU
NANDAN THAKUR
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
3. 1.7.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the
offence under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The first information report was instituted against
unknown persons when two dead bodies of unknown males were
found by the informant. During investigation it transpired that the
petitioner was the driver of the vehicle which was owned by one of
the deceased and in which the other deceased was a khalasi. It
was alleged that the petitioner had taken the owner and the khalasi
with him and thereafter they were found dead but the petitioner
with the vehicle in question was missing.
In view of such, I am not inclined to grant bail to the
petitioner.
The prayer for bail is rejected.
However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail
after framing of charge. At the time of renewal of bail the petitioner
shall specify about his antecedents.
( Anjana Prakash, J. )
Narendra/