High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Joginder Singh vs State Of Punjab on 31 July, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Joginder Singh vs State Of Punjab on 31 July, 2009
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                        CHANDIGARH

                               Crl. Misc No. M-15591 of 2009
                               Date of decision : 31.07.2009


Joginder Singh
                                                          ....Petitioner

                                      V/s


State of Punjab
                                                          ....Respondent

BEFORE : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present: Mr. S.K. Arora, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG Punjab.

RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL)

This is a petition for regular bail in a case registered against the

petitioner under Sections 302, 307, 325, 324, 323, 201, 148 & 149 IPC and

Section 25, 27, 54 and 59 of Arms Act at police station Khuian Sarwar,

Tehsil Abohar, District Ferozepur vide FIR No. 23 dated 14.02.2008.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no injury is

attributed to the petitioner as regards the deceased. However, petitioner is

stated to have caused an injury only to Harjinder Singh, the injured witness.

According to the counsel, injuries attributed to the petitioner have been

declared simple in nature. Counsel submits that petitioner has already

undergone incarceration since 27.02.2008.

Injuries attributed to the petitioner have been declared to be

simple in nature is not contested by learned State counsel. He has, however,

opposed the prayer for grant of bail on the ground that petitioner actively

participated in the commission of crime and caused injury to one Harjinder

Singh.

Crl. Misc No. M-15591 of 2009 -2-

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and

taking into consideration the period of detention already suffered by him

and the fact that trial may take some time to conclude, I deem it appropriate

to grant regular bail to the petitioner. Accordingly the petition is allowed

and he is ordered to be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of trial court.

31.07.2009                                                 (RAJAN GUPTA)
Ajay                                                          JUDGE