High Court Kerala High Court

Johney vs State Of Kerala Represented By … on 17 August, 2007

Kerala High Court
Johney vs State Of Kerala Represented By … on 17 August, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 2616 of 2007()


1. JOHNEY,S/O.KOSHY SAMUEL,JUSTIN VILLA,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE C.I. OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :17/08/2007

 O R D E R
                           R.BASANT, J.
                        ----------------------
                     Crl.M.C.No.2616 of 2007
                    ----------------------------------------
              Dated this the 17th day of August 2007

                               O R D E R

The petitioner is the first accused in a crime registered

under Section 420 I.P.C. Investigation is complete. Final report

has already been filed. Cognizance has been taken by the

learned Magistrate. The petitioner had been released on bail at

the stage of investigation. But subsequently he has not appeared

before the learned Magistrate. According to the petitioner, he

was not duly served and that is why he could not earlier appear

before the learned Magistrate. The petitioner is now willing to

appear before the learned Magistrate; but a warrant of arrest

issued by the learned Magistrate against the petitioner is

chasing him. The petitioner apprehends that he may be arrested

before he appears before the learned Magistrate. He further

apprehends that when he surrenders and applies for bail, the

learned Magistrate may not consider his application for bail on

merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously. The petitioner

has a further request that his claim for discharge may be

directed to be considered expeditiously by the learned

Crl.M.C.No.2616/07 2

Magistrate.

2. Having considered all the relevant inputs, I am

satisfied that appropriate directions can be issued in the matter

and this petition can be allowed in part.

3. In the result, this petition is allowed in part.

Following directions are issued:

i) The petitioner shall surrender before the learned

Magistrate at 11 a.m on 22/8/2007. Till then, the warrant of

arrest issued against him shall not be executed. The petitioner

may apply for bail and the learned Magistrate must proceed to

pass appropriate orders on such application for bail on merits, in

accordance with law and expeditiously – on the date of surrender

itself. The petitioner must give sufficient prior notice to the

prosecutor in charge of the case. He can give such notice before

he surrenders before the learned Magistrate.

ii) The learned Magistrate shall consider the plea of

discharge which the petitioner wants to raise at the stage of

Section 239/240 Cr.P.C, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate,

within a period of one month from the date of his appearance.




                                           (R.BASANT, JUDGE)
jsr
            // True Copy//     PA to Judge

Crl.M.C.No.2616/07    3

Crl.M.C.No.2616/07    4

       R.BASANT, J.




         CRL.M.CNo.




            ORDER




21ST DAY OF MAY2007