High Court Kerala High Court

Johny Abraham vs Secretary on 2 January, 2009

Kerala High Court
Johny Abraham vs Secretary on 2 January, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 234 of 2009(C)



1. JOHNY ABRAHAM
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. SECRETARY
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.MANOJ P.KUNJACHAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :02/01/2009

 O R D E R
                             S.SIRI JAGAN, J
                    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                         W.P(C)No. 234 of 2009
                    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
               Dated this the 2nd day of January, 2009

                              J U D G M E N T

Petitioners are residents of the locality wherein the 2nd respondent

issued Ext.P1 licence in favour of the 5th respondent for establishment

of a vault type cemetery. Petitioners challenge the same on the ground

that there was no proper publication as contemplated under Rule 6(7)

of the Kerala Panchayat Raj (Burial and Burning Grounds) Rules, 1998.

In the above circumstances, petitioners have filed Ext.P2 application

before the Government, which has been acknowledged by Ext.P3. The

petitioner seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass

orders on Ext.P2, as expeditiously as possible.

2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. In the

nature of the order, I propose to pass, I do not think it necessary to

issue notice to the respondents 4 and 5 for the present.

Although, Ext.P2 is addressed to the Ministry for Local Self

Government, from Ext.P3 it is seen that the same has been forwarded

to the 1st respondent for consideration. In the above circumstances, this

writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to

consider and pass orders on Ext.P2, as expeditiously as possible, at

W.P(C)No. 234 of 2009 – 2 –

any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment. It would be open to the petitioner to move the 1st respondent

for stay which shall also be considered by the 1st respondent within one

week from the date when a stay petition is moved.

S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

rhs