High Court Kerala High Court

Jose P. Kallooparambil vs P. Babu on 18 July, 2008

Kerala High Court
Jose P. Kallooparambil vs P. Babu on 18 July, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Con.Case(C).No. 878 of 2008(S)


1. JOSE P. KALLOOPARAMBIL, 52, S/O PHILIPH,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. P.N. VISHNURADHAN, AGED 52,
3. K.N. NEELAKANTAN NAMBOOTHIRI,
4. K.C. SUKUMARAN ACHARI, AGED 54,
5. T.J.JAMESKUTTY, AGED 50,
6. P.A. VARGHESE, AGED 50 S/O ABRAHAM,
7. RAJU XAVIER, AGED 46, S/O THOMAS,
8. MARGRET ISSAC, AGED 53, D/O ISSAC,
9. PIOUS MATHAI, AGED 52,
10. ANNIE JOSE K. AGED 46, D/O JOSEPH
11. DHRRL MSFONS M., SHRF 52,
12. A.B. JOHN JOSEPH, AGED 47, AGOSHONE
13. RIJU GREGORY, AGED 35 S/O GREGORY,
14. V. MATHEW, AGED 36, S/O VARGHESE,
15. CHERIAN J.KOTTOZHAN, AGED 51, JACOB
16. K.G. THADEVOOSE, AGED 33,
17. ANGELLA JEEN THOMAS, AGED 47,

                        Vs



1. P. BABU, WORKING AS THE DEPUTY
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.J.OM PRAKASH

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :18/07/2008

 O R D E R
                                       K.T. SANKARAN, J.
                 ............................................................................
                     CONTEMPT CASE (C) No. 878 OF 2008
                 ............................................................................
                                 Dated this the 18th July, 2008



                                        J U D G M E N T

Complaining that the respondent has wilfully and deliberately disobeyed the

orders issued by this court in W.P.(C) 4232 of 2005, the petitioners have approached

this court by this Contempt Case. According to the petitioners, Annexure-B

communication dated 04.06.2008 issued by the respondent to the Principal of the

College would indicate that he has not complied with the directions contained in the

judgment.

2. Learned Government Pleader, on instruction, submits that the Deputy

Director of Collegiate Education has passed an order dated 21.06.2008, a copy of which

was handed over to me for perusal. It is submitted that the order dated 21.06.20098

would result in full compliance of Annexure-A judgment in W.P.(C) 4232 of 2005.

Though Writ Petition No.4232 of 2005 and Annexure-B communication are not referred

to in the order dated 21.06.2008, I accept the submission made by the Government

Pleader that the petitioners will get the benefit of Annexure-A judgment and that there

will be no difficulty in implementing Annexure-A judgment. It is also submitted by the

Government Pleader that the respondent would fully comply with the directions

contained in the judgment. Placing on record the submission made by the

Government Pleader, the Contempt Case is closed. It is made clear that if and when

CONTEMPT CASE (C) No. 878 OF 2008

2

occasion arises, the petitioners would be entitled to approach this Court again if they are

aggrieved by non-implementation of Annexure-A judgment. They are also free to

challenge the order dated 21.06.2008 appropriately.

With the above observations, the Contempt Case is closed.

K.T. SANKARAN,
JUDGE.

lk