High Court Karnataka High Court

Joseph S Maben vs State Of Karnataka on 22 August, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Joseph S Maben vs State Of Karnataka on 22 August, 2008
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh
OURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR'II,0I'*'_;KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

_..u

23% THE HIQH COEJRT €192?' ?§P:Ri€}'-;T}'LFE"x, B}'*xI'J$PxhQRE 

aATEn THEE Tfifi EE"'nA¥ fiF AflQUST, 2ae3{*f$f*

EEFQKE
THE Hmm*9L5 MR. J$s$1cE'H5paEanz gJfiA$Efi#G
w.P.wo.16a43x29a%¢Bna;f I I I I
sgwwssw I

J8$E?fi'3 MABEH
A359 A503? 52 VEARS .

Effi.aRTE $ELEERT.J.MAEEW?
R;AT,na.14!2,*c'cRa33,"'

R.fiNNRiAH REBBY LRYGETIHI,
nmB2a?Aya5Jwan:f'_ .' "=g _-,«_ -«,'
3A§GaLaRs--43.: 'y,' 2 : ;;."?ETITIGfiER

tsy 9:3 : é3M53f%%naI§S3écz§TS$;UAnV3 3

A33 .

l.....ie

STRTEIGFIKAREAWEHRU
;'7;:.E£:"r"._E"t" Iii'-3_ CHIEF SECRETARY,
jfixnanma smanaafls

I".V"BAfiéALéRgw1.

Egi.g§Rfi$$£flfiEH%EVELGFMEwT ABTHGRETY

A'$ENKE?@Rfl&B,KfiMARA PEEK wssr,
,3Amam;QfiE~2G.
Z5I~;.EP'; ITS !'3iI!}*-E!-1'I£-'?3I€iE%3ER. . . . RESFDNDENTS

',;Ey 5:: : K KRISHMR FGR R2 RED 321 E MANQHAR,

AGE F63 F11?

THEE ELF. EVII.-HEB PRAYING TC! QUEER THE DRDEF.

_V =,§§§ax--J ET. §.5.£e9$ 353 $9 3223:? THE
I"'?;IE$P'lIiE«§BEE*E'3'S TC? ALLQT TE-EE SEHE EETE NID.8'?1, IR

$715

E3352'? XI, IN J31.F4.¥ZJ'%'u.'a'A'¥.'}-[I LFEYEFUT TS THE FETITIQNEF.
C334; iii 'THE E's.f.«']"ERI'3}-"-.'§'IL"*.*"E TC? £~'&izLf§.i'i' 51!? OTHER SITE TE}
'?'"t-EE I"E'?'E'§'*Eé3%=2E§:. Ebé TEE SEME .é'3£='i3~'R"»"I%."1"E-L';I LFk'{*~i31'.}'I'..

>95'



OUR? OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR3.'"§.}'F:KARNATAi(A HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HSGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Eh flémcallatioza ef the aita was durillg _t11a

year 2336. Sf cauzae, tbs yetiti9ne:F*hadg
ébytfiflflhflfl this fleurt after a lapse éf fi0feH¥"
than wafi year and abate is mg Bush refiulafifin"

tfiat in 33 fax a3 §fl'x4fi' di&efiaicn'ffi:_whiéh"=

caflfifimatian af daiay ifiF§§k§n§"gaymé$Eflficuid
he cmnaidezed. I§;§s $haw$fibm§BfiiOnH0E the
i%&$mnfi. asunaei fafiF'%héF,§§s§%fifi%mt~Autharity
that in E&B§§$#aQf!%E%$fii§§Efi%fit Ff sites of
3Q'3 3%' ;"§§fii¢f§£"3§§'F'ffi§mafi%ians delayed
§aymen@a"wii§ E§§ac¢%§§éfi by im§caing intereat
at the Ffiafie Tfi§V_ii§2:§ffi%r 6% days af the

alimtmamt %iliVtha;§ayment is made. That is

'F3$t.F§Qfifii$Eibi%~~ifi ..... the saga af 6@'x40'

'fiim5fifi;&g;f*&$.th5 amailar fiimenaisn sites are

ma&n£'f$r"fi%é waake: aaetimns of the Scciety,

'th* Eun§aEa:e Eeveiapment Authazity has Shawn

V".'EtncéEBi$n&

fé. In View sf the aubmiaaion made and alsa

hfiVifl§ ragatd ta tha factuai pasitian, it is

difizmalt ta» tmnaidez the sage of the

W



OURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR'[.OF'jKARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA H¥GH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

IA

getitianar rather it is £139 difficult ta

fiixefit the reap©ndant~EangaiQre Develagmen:

&uth$tity' ta amnsifiaz the case _§f"=fthéqU"

E

:11

E} ,

9'

bwzi
iwi

<2':

the altarnate mite a§<:tha sa$eV dim§ngian.O

fimwever; when the getitignaz §Amaelf% had
gvarcmme tha finan¢ial_;ha£a$hipb anfi came
fmzwazd ta pag.the cmngiéezatisfi amount, the

easa of 4Hfihef",péti€;Q$eEV' Eé pasitivaly

fifififilfifiifid'f$I%§ilfl§méhfi1§f¥33'34Q' dimenaisn

fiita fig ,AxRa?a:fi$ xL£§snt fir in any athsr

'g?fl'v,Th§VO--U§etitiGn%: ahall submit a

zagxésantétidn ta tha zgspandent-anthmrity

'»_ within» fiwm mnnthag fin raaeipt sf such
",_:E3r%aentatiGn haing filed by the petitianer;

"=HUit;ia $0: the :aap¢n£Q§t*B&£ga1a:e Devalopment

1

:&utmc:it§* tfis cmnsider thg aama expediti¢u5ly'

ané ailat a sita in any 9f the layouts formed

.4 W

("T

b4 i

tmuimnez fa: allmtment Gfim the_"Eam§HOaite_

.8?1 in Eiack Ra.XE mi firkavathy1Laybutf§r¢~



thief  

_ ..
w .
.. 43
m.  a g
/ .... ..
m an
5  ....J
E 
b
s,
3-H fl
 a
 d
.3
mm
mm.
m.
..

M .,,_
t. fl
5
1
….

W.” n
,2 E _,.

a t w
‘.1. ff
.1 R
a m
A?” .5. mp.

k¢DOU I0″… S.<»<zx5_ mo ._.mDOU $92.. S_<»<z._S. ".0 .5500. $0.1 §S<zx5_ "HO .–.¢DOU 10.3 §<p<zm<m,..u5…b_:ou $0.: $_<h<z¢$_ mo 53