High Court Kerala High Court

Joseph vs State Of Kerala on 7 September, 2007

Kerala High Court
Joseph vs State Of Kerala on 7 September, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 5373 of 2007()


1. JOSEPH, AGED 62 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. ANNEY, W/O.JOSEPH, AGED 55 YEARS,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SUB INSPECTOR
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.DEVIDAS.U.K

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :07/09/2007

 O R D E R
                             R.BASANT, J.
                          ----------------------
                        B.A.No.5373 of 2007
                    ----------------------------------------
            Dated this the 7th day of September 2007


                               O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioners are

accused 2 and 3. They are the parents of the first accused. The

crux of the allegations is that the accused persons defrauded and

deceived the victims on the false promise that work permits shall

be made available to the victims who sought employment abroad.

The work permits were not issued. Amounts were received; but

not repaid. The victims realised that the accused persons were

involved in an attempt to deceive and defraud the victims.

Crime has been registered on the basis of a private complaint

filed before the learned Magistrate and referred by the learned

Magistrate to the police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

the petitioners are absolutely innocent. The allegation, if any, is

only against the first accused. They have been arrayed

unnecessarily as accused in an attempt to vex and harass them

so that the first accused can be compelled to agree to the terms

of the de facto complainant and settle the disputes. The

B.A.No.5373/07 2

petitioners, aged parents of the first accused, do not deserve to

stand the trauma of arrest and detention, submits the learned

counsel for the petitioners.

3. The application is not opposed by the learned Public

Prosecutor. Having considered all the relevant inputs, I am

persuaded to agree that the petitioners can be granted

anticipatory bail subject to appropriate terms and conditions.

4. In the result, this petition is allowed. Following

directions are issued under Section 438 Cr.P.C in favour of the

petitioners.

i) Petitioners shall surrender before the learned

Magistrate having jurisdiction at 11 a.m on 14/09/2007.

ii) They shall be released on regular bail on condition

that they execute bonds for Rs.25,000/-(Rupees twenty five

thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like

sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate.

iii) The petitioners shall make themselves available for

interrogation before the investigating officer between 10 a.m

and 3 p.m on 15/09/2007 and 16/09/2007 and thereafter on all

Mondays and Fridays between 10 a.m and 12 noon for a period

B.A.No.5373/07 3

of two months and subsequently as and when directed by the

investigating officer in writing to do so.

(iv) If the petitioners do not appear before the learned

Magistrate as directed in clause (i), directions issued above shall

thereafter stand revoked and the police shall be at liberty to

arrest the petitioners and deal with them in accordance with law,

as if these directions were not issued at all.

(v) If they were arrested prior to 14/09/2007, they shall

be released from custody on their executing bond for Rs.25,000/-

(Rupees twenty five thousand only) without any sureties,

undertaking to appear before the learned Magistrate on

14/09/2007.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
jsr

B.A.No.5373/07 4

B.A.No.5373/07 5

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.CNo.

ORDER

21ST DAY OF MAY2007