High Court Kerala High Court

Joseph vs Thressia @ Baby on 8 November, 2010

Kerala High Court
Joseph vs Thressia @ Baby on 8 November, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

OP(C).No. 620 of 2010()


1. JOSEPH, S/O.VARGHESE, AGED 52 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THRESSIA @ BABY, W/O.VARGHESE, AGED 74
                       ...       Respondent

2. MARRY @ SHERLY,D/O.VARGHESE &

3. MANUAL, S/O.VARGHESE,AGED 50 YEARS,

4. ANIE, D/O.VARGHESE & W/O P.X.JOSEPH,

5. JANCY, D/O.VARGHESE & W/O.BABU ABRAHAM

6. PAUL PIOUS, S/O.VARGHESE, AGED 46 YERAS

7. SEBASTIAN @ SEALASTINE, S/O.VARGHESE

8. JOHNY, S/O.VARGHESE, AGED 39, BUSINESS,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.B.JAYASANKAR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH

 Dated :08/11/2010

 O R D E R
                  THOMAS P JOSEPH, J.

                 ----------------------------------------

                     O.P(C).No.620 of 2010

                  ---------------------------------------

            Dated this 08th day of November, 2010

                            JUDGMENT

This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution is

directed against Exts.P11 and P12, orders. There are two suits in

which petitioner is involved. In O.S.No.545 of 2008 petitioner

filed I.A.No.1622 of 2010 for joint trial of that suit with

O.S.No.673 of 2008. In O.S.No.673 of 2008 respondent filed

I.A.No.4788 of 2009 challenging maintainability of the suit and

requested the court to decide the same as a preliminary issue.

Along with that petitioner also filed I.A.No.1621 of 2010 to call

for records from the Tribunal concerned. Learned Sub Judge

disposed of I.A.Nos.1621 of 2010 and 4788 of 2009. I.A.No.1621

of 2010 has been dismissed while I.A.No.4788 of 2009 was partly

allowed and O.S.No.673 of 2008 has been dismissed as not

maintainable as it is barred by limitation. Challenging these

orders this original petition is filed. Learned counsel submits that

against dismissal of suit on allowing I.A.No.4788 of 2009

petitioner has filed an appeal before the learned District Judge.

Learned counsel states that petitioner has challenged the

correctness of the order on I.A.Nos.1621 of 2010 and 1622 of

O.P(C).No.620 of 2010
: 2 :

2010 in that appeal. It is also submitted that in view of filing of

the appeal this revision petition is not being pursued.

Resultantly this petition is closed.

(THOMAS P JOSEPH, JUDGE)

Sbna/-