Posted On by &filed under Gujarat High Court, High Court.


Gujarat High Court
Joshi vs District on 18 November, 2011
Author: S.R.Brahmbhatt,
  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CA/10509/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION - FOR VACATING STAY No. 10509 of 2011
 

In


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 3867 of 2010
 

With


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 4650 of 2011
 

In
 


SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 3867 of 2010
 

 
 
=================================================


 

JOSHI
JITUBHAI JAYSHANKAR - Petitioner
 

Versus
 

DISTRICT
DEVELOPMENT OFFICER & 3 - Respondents
 

=================================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
TEJAS P SATTA for Petitioner : 
MR HS MUNSHAW for Respondent :
1, 
None for Respondent : 2, 
GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent :
3, 
MR RAVINDRA SHAH for Respondent :
4, 
================================================= 

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 18/11/2011 

 

 
 
COMMON
ORAL ORDER

Mr.

Satta for the applicant in Civil Application No. 10509 of 2011 and
Mr. Rajesh Chauhan for Mr. Munshaw in Civil Application No. 4650 of
2011 have requested that time & again priority is sought for
hearing of the matters, but unfortunately the petitioner’s advocate
is unable to attend the Court, and the matter is not heard. On
account of stay order granted on 30/3/2010 the concerned respondent
Sarpanch and petitioner in the main petition is indulging in all
sorts of misconducts with impunity as the DDO is unable to take
action on account of the stay order inuring in his favour.

This
Court is of the view that when such grievance is made
wherein the authorities feel handicapped in taking action for
subsequent misconducts of the Sarpanch petitioner, the civil
applications are required to be heard on urgent basis. Today as
learned advocate for the original petitioner-Sarpanch is not
available, therefore both the civil applications are posted on
21/11/2011 and on that day appropriate orders is to be passed.

[
S.R. BRAHMBHATT, J ]

/vgn

   

Top


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

105 queries in 0.155 seconds.