High Court Kerala High Court

Joshy Mohandas vs Director Of Public Instructions on 23 October, 2009

Kerala High Court
Joshy Mohandas vs Director Of Public Instructions on 23 October, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 28682 of 2009(E)


1. JOSHY MOHANDAS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,
                       ...       Respondent

2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR (EDUCATION),

3. THE HEADMISTRESS,

4. THE COMMANDING OFFICER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.SREEKUMAR

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :23/10/2009

 O R D E R
                     T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J.
                   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                     W.P.(C) No.28682 of 2009-E
                  - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
             Dated this the 23rd day of October, 2009.

                                JUDGMENT

The petitioner herein has been working as a Physical Education

Teacher in Govt. Boys High School, Kayamkulam. He was posted as such

as per Ext.P1 order. He was also working as the care taker of the NCC unit

in the said school. It is his case that there are 130 cadets in the unit and

considering the difficulties to get caretakers for maintaining NCC units and

the number of units, the petitioner was selected to undergo further training.

The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P4 order by which he is transferred to

G.R.F.T. High School, Arthunkal. According to him, the transfer has caused

undue hardship now, in the sense that NCC Unit in the said school will not

get his service and apart from that, if he is transferred to Arthunkal, he will

have to reside in the hostel and therefore, there will be nobody to look after

his family which includes his wife and a two year old child.

2. The petitioner has produced along with I.A. No.13170/2009,

Ext.P8 representation submitted before the Director of Public Instruction in

the matter.

3. In the statement filed on behalf of the second respondent, mainly

wpc 28682/2009 2

it is pointed out that it is due to the dearth of sufficient periods in

Kayamkulam that the post had to be abolished and the petitioner had to be

transferred.

4. The Director of Public Instruction will therefore consider Ext.P8

and pass appropriate orders within a period of one month from the date of

production of a copy of this judgment. The grievances highlighted by the

petitioner will be considered while such orders are passed. The competent

officer of G.R.F.T. High School will consider the request of the petitioner

to divest him from the duties as Warden in view of the personal difficulties

experienced by him.

The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

(T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)

kav/