High Court Kerala High Court

Joshy vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 24 November, 2009

Kerala High Court
Joshy vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 24 November, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 32325 of 2009(I)


1. JOSHY, AGED 33, S/O. PAULOSE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
                       ...       Respondent

2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,

3. SUB ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION,

4. STATE BANK OF INDIA,

5. O.S. ABRAHAM, S/O. DEVASSY,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR)

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :24/11/2009

 O R D E R
                                S.SIRI JAGAN, J.

                        ==================

                         W.P(C).No.32325 of 2009

                        ==================

               Dated this the 24th day of November, 2009

                                J U D G M E N T

The petitioner and his wife jointly purchased certain properties,

by Ext.P2 sale deed. The petitioner filed an application for electricity

connection to the petitioner’s building. The same was not allowed on

the ground that the previous owner of the property is in arrears of

electricity charges to the Kerala State Electricity Board, which has to

be cleared before the application can be considered. It is under the

above circumstances, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking

the following reliefs:

“i. To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or
direction, directing respondents 1 to 3 to give a new electric
connection to the building in the property of the petitioner and his
wife covered by Exhibit P2 title deed within a time limit.

ii. to grant such other reliefs which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and
proper in the circumstances of the case.”

2. The learned standing counsel for the Electricity Board

submits that the attempt of the Board to recover the arrears from the

original owner has not succeeded, since the original owner has moved

out of the District. According to the standing counsel, the Board has no

other means to recover the arrears except to insist on the transferee

to make good the arrears as a condition for granting new electricity

connection.

2

3. I have considered the rival contentions in detail.

4. It is an admitted fact that as per Clause 12 of the Kerala

Electricity Supply Code, 2005, and Regulation 7 of the Conditions of

Supply of Electrical Energy, for new electricity connection the Board

cannot insist on the present owner paying the arrears of electricity

charges due from the previous owner. That being so, the respondents

cannot make payment of arrears of electricity charges due from the

previous owner as a condition for granting fresh electricity connection

to the present owner. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is

disposed of with a direction to respondents 2 and 3 to give electricity

connection to the petitioner without insisting on the petitioner paying

arrears of electricity charges due from the previous owner, provided

the petitioner has complied with all other statutory conditions for the

same, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a

certified copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

sdk+                                             S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

          ///True copy///




                             P.A. to Judge