High Court Kerala High Court

Joshy vs State Of Kerala Represented By on 31 March, 2010

Kerala High Court
Joshy vs State Of Kerala Represented By on 31 March, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 1533 of 2010()


1. JOSHY,S/O.OORUPARAMBIL SUBRAMANIAN,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SURESH @ SURESHKUMAR, S/O.KONNACHAN
3. VAISAKH, SON OF MOOKKOLA VEETIL VINODE,
4. KANNAN, S/O.THEKKEPPATT VETTIL KARAPPU,
5. KUTTAN @ RAJESH, S/O.THOOMATT VEETTIL

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.RAJIT

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :31/03/2010

 O R D E R
                            K.T.SANKARAN, J.
               ------------------------------------------------------
                        B.A. NO. 1533 OF 2010
               ------------------------------------------------------
              Dated this the 31st day of March, 2010


                                  O R D E R

This is an application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure. The petitioners are accused Nos.1, 2, 4, 5 and

6 in Crime No.47 of 2010 of Pavaratty Police Station, Thrissur

District.

2. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under

Sections 143, 147, 148, 447, 324, 506(ii), 326 and 308 read with

Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case is that on 24.1.2010, the accused

persons attacked the uncle of the de facto complainant with deadly

weapons and he sustained grievous hurt including three fractures.

He was subjected to a surgery. The First Information Statement was

given by the nephew of the victim as the victim was admitted in the

Intensive Care Unit of the hospital. The motive for the attack was

that the injured had reported to the police about certain illegal

activities of the accused.

B.A. NO. 1533 OF 2010

:: 2 ::

4. The petitioners were arrested on 4.3.2010 and they were

remanded to judicial custody.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

case, the duration of the judicial custody undergone by the

petitioners, the nature of the offence and the present stage of

investigation, I am of the view that bail can be granted to the

petitioners on stringent conditions.

6. The petitioners shall be released on bail on their executing

bond for Rs.25,000/- each with two solvent sureties for the like

amount to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate of the First

Class, Chavakkad, subject to the following conditions:

a) The petitioners shall report before the
investigating officer between 9 A.M. and 11
A.M. on all Mondays and Thursdays for a period
of two months and thereafter, on all Mondays, till
the final report is filed or until further orders;

b) The petitioners shall appear before the
investigating officer for interrogation as and
when required;

B.A. NO. 1533 OF 2010

:: 3 ::

c) The petitioners shall not try to influence the
prosecution witnesses or tamper with the
evidence;

d) The petitioners shall not commit any offence or
indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail;

e) In case of breach of any of the conditions
mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be
cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed as above.

(K.T.SANKARAN)
Judge
ahz/