Joy vs The Secretary on 2 February, 2009

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 3368 of 2009(A)


1. JOY,S/O.MATHAI, NAGARATHU HOUSE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :02/02/2009

 O R D E R
                      ANTONY DOMINIC,J.
                 -----------------------
                   W.P.(C).No.3368 OF 2009
                ------------------------
            Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2009.

                           JUDGMENT

Petitioner submits that by Ext.P1, he was granted

variation without any change in the existing timings. Although,

the variation has been endorsed by Ext.P4, petitioner has not

been issued timing for the extended sector. It is with this

grievance that the writ petition is filed.

2. Taking into account the aforesaid grievance, the writ

petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider

the petitioner’s above grievance and issue orders, allotting

timings for the extended sector allowed as per Ext.P1.

Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along

with a copy of the writ petition before the respondent for

compliance.

vi                                      (ANTONY DOMINIC)
                                              JUDGE