High Court Kerala High Court

Jumi vs Indian Overseas Bank on 3 August, 2007

Kerala High Court
Jumi vs Indian Overseas Bank on 3 August, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 23334 of 2007(C)


1. JUMI, AGED 40, W/O KASIM,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.VARGHESE PREM

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :03/08/2007

 O R D E R
                          S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
                       --------------------------
                    W.P.(C)NO.23334 OF 2007
                       -------------------------
          DATED THIS THE 3rd DAY OF AUGUST, 2007

                             JUDGMENT

The petitioner challenges proceedings under the

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement

of Security Interest Act. However, the petitioner limits her prayer for

permission to pay off the amounts in instalments.

2. The learned standing counsel appearing for the bank

stoutly opposes the prayer. According to him, the petitioner is not

entitled to any relief, in so far as admittedly the petitioner is a

defaulter. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner has

been paying the amounts due regularly till 2006 and only because of

the breakdown of her business and a very serious road accident in

which her son was seriously injured, she could not pay the amounts

subsequently.

3. Having heard both sides, I feel that a lenient attitude can

be taken to the petitioner in the matter of payment of amounts in

instalments. Accordingly, I dispose of this writ petition with the

following directions.

The petitioner shall pay an amount of Rs.3.5 lakhs within one

W.P.(c)No.23334/07 2

month from today. The balance amounts shall be paid in six equal

monthly instalments starting from 1.10.2007. Every subsequent

instalments shall be paid on the 1st working day of every succeeding

month. If the petitioner pays the above amounts and instalments

on the due dates, further proceedings pursuant to impugned notices

shall be kept in abeyance. However, if the petitioner commits

default in payment of the initial lump sum payment or any of the

instalments, it would be open to the respondents to continue

proceedings as now initiated without having to issue any fresh

notice or proceedings in that regard.

S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

Acd

W.P.(c)No.23334/07 3