Junnu Rama Goud vs Commissioner Of Proh. And Excise … on 22 September, 2003

0
84
Andhra High Court
Junnu Rama Goud vs Commissioner Of Proh. And Excise … on 22 September, 2003
Equivalent citations: 2003 (6) ALT 212
Author: D Gupta
Bench: D Gupta, C Ramulu


ORDER

Devinder Gupta, C.J.

1. Fourth respondent herein, viz., Tappers’ Co-operative Society, Bhainsa, Adilabad District, rejected appellant’s application for membership in the society. Representation made by appellant to the Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Karimnagar Division, was also rejected on the ground that ‘tapper’ means a person who is major and who is engaged in the profession of tapping and who can climb and draw toddy from the toddy trees and the appellant was not engaged in the profession of tapping toddy, but was engaged in doing business in jewellery at Bhainsa. After rejection of his representation, appeal was filed, which was dismissed by the Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Hyderabad, on 18th of July, 2002. Learned Single Judge also dismissed the writ petition of the appellant on the ground that the appellant has not fulfilled the required criteria for being admitted as a member of the society.

2. Appellant has no vested right to be admitted as a member of the society. He has only a right to be considered for being admitted as a member of the society. This question has been duly considered by the authorities taking into consideration the relevant factors and no interference is called for by us in this appeal. In case circumstances change in future, there is no embargo in the appellant’s applying afresh for fresh consideration in accordance with law.

3. Writ appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *