High Court Kerala High Court

K.A.Abraham vs The Labour Court on 26 June, 2007

Kerala High Court
K.A.Abraham vs The Labour Court on 26 June, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WA No. 1443 of 2007()


1. K.A.ABRAHAM, MANGATTORATHU,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE LABOUR COURT, ERNAKULAM.
                       ...       Respondent

2. KUNNAPPALLY KSHEEROPADAKA SAHAKARANA

                For Petitioner  :SRI.LEGY ABRAHAM

                For Respondent  :SRI.JOSE J.MATHAIKAL

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :26/06/2007

 O R D E R


                    H.L. DATTU, C.J.  &   K.T. SANKARAN, J.

           ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

            C.M.Appln. No.604 of 2007 and  W.A.No.1443 of 2007

           ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

                      Dated, this the  26th day of June, 2007


                                        JUDGMENT

H.L. DATTU, CJ.

The appellant in this appeal calls in question the correctness or

otherwise of the orders passed by the learned Single Judge in

O.P.No.18443/1995 dated 16th March 2005. By the impugned order the

learned Judge has rejected the writ petition only on the ground that though

the respondents were prepared to reinstate the petitioner into service, for

some reason or other the petitioner did not chose to accept the offer made

by the respondent society.

2. There is a delay in filing the writ appeal. For condonation of

delay in filing the appeal, petitioner has filed an application under section 5

of the Limitation Act.

3. In the affidavit filed along with the application the petitioner has

stated that he was suffering from some ailments and further there was a

tussle between him and his son and therefore he could not contact his

advocate to prefer an appeal within the period of limitation.

4. There is a delay of 772 days in filing the appeal and the delay in

filing the appeal is not properly explained. The reason assigned by the

applicant in the affidavit, in our opinion, is wholly unsatisfactory. Therefore

the said explanation cannot be accepted by us. Therefore the application

W.A.No.1443/2007 2

for condoning the delay in filing the appeal requires to be rejected.

Accordingly it is rejected.

Consequently the appeal also stands rejected. Ordered

accordingly.

H.L. DATTU,

CHIEF JUSTICE.

K.T. SANKARAN,

JUDGE.

mt/