High Court Karnataka High Court

K A Rathnakar vs N Thayanna on 27 May, 2009

Karnataka High Court
K A Rathnakar vs N Thayanna on 27 May, 2009
Author: H N Das
aarsn THIS THE 27" DAY; .:::z-f_:«:3.v1--'i2'£3tz*s=.i'_';».  '
azamas V " ' '  '
THE HON' 31.5: Ma..:u3'rza;*24.1_;»:.r:;"1e'25i<;Aa;o}L:a:i' ;;':..a;3;  .

Betwaen:

K.A.¥I.athn:~:kar

3/0 Psgaiah Go'ss§a.__ .   ~ 
Aged 4'? ya-23.23'   =:   A ' 
Rfat no.9,_,,~ 44  'V  __   

sri vankai:a3I:rJa.ra*Ni,l'aya  V'

W' !I{a.i:_1,_VT"?""~'.'.VV '::;~*.3_sV, , V' '

Hoysala Naggra  '-
sa::ga11 ora_--Saii-"  

. . Eetitinnar

(By ;:;a.a~:='.._ K. Iiantgzhaétfiéréyappa, Adv. 1

   " 'A

 N.Ths§*anna.  

 S50 Harayanazswaxiiy
.. Rgézi ahmt"  years

i  2. "  sfifégraaaswanzy
a  .S_g'z_: 1at;ie"'PhayanrLa
  aibmt 75 years

 '   u3 .r1'»tunegmrc1a
 "S20 Narayanaswamy
 Aged ahxaut £1 3"€3.ZI'5

   

<7Z~'V"""

E €;:3i;§L3E{"§' GP %fia,E%NflT'&'iIE-'--...«;s-*-e:._ Wfifikfi  mwmmm Wififi QGUW" Q? mwmmm WGH fiflififf 0? %%z§§§'w3¢§?'2£Tfi)<fi3a%fie. HEGH amzm" Q? KA.§%NAYAK& W6?-i COB

IN THE HIGH comm' ea" rcAaNA'r.=a.icA. P-ft' sA;rg;;ALo}af'E:.}?"'  "



'b'WtM$.§ wr-mmmNm-emmm- -me.-an wwwfi-a.'vr--mnnmmmam.em wmm mww-m wr ammmgmamnn" -I-new 1.;UlJ!3 is hereby éispansed.

2.u1fi §his writ Eatitian the getitianer has

=.§fi3yéd'£gr a writ in the natura af aartiarari ta
'=i ,q3a§a§£fi§ ardar éatad 9.4«2aa9 in 999 No.B3l2fiB3
'"*»._ pgéééa by the xxx: Addl.City Civil Judge at

fl »§$ngalore rejecting IA $0.? filed under Gwder 1

Rule 10 CFC.

1W'~



i a;:mm"¥ W? Kfififlflffiflfi fifififi  KfiRNA'?&Kfi HEGH CGUW' Q? mmmmw. WGH CWUFW OF  WQH CQHW" GP K&RE'~l.M"A%A MGR COU

3. ?ir5t respondent filad _wa: a$fiit_ £fiu<fl

0. s .1~.’o. 150621994 against tnef’ :é_:§;:«:rita.__er:.gta.:_’: 2, _

far partitian and se§g:ate’»pé53es3ivfi ‘¢f’;fii5*,

sham in tha plaint s’cLz;:éau1a ‘p;i:apér£i.g”§’;” ‘Phe

Trial Court pas59d__ a’~AV””pr:é§..ijién.naryé”*da’éiraa in
Q.S.Ho.1506l19Q4. %hare§f§é£fififiélfegpondant na.1
initiatad ‘£i§a1 {§é¢§§e f§;§fiea$ings in Fa?
No.83/26O3: ,5f§mjtfi§4 m§afi§§i;§;Mxrespendent nn.2
sob 2 a¢fe§ fig lfifid fififi 95 the plaint schadula
propaktiasx §fif fav6fi¥*;af: the patiticnax herein
under dead dated 21.2.2003.

Th§§’petiti¢n§£ oh coming ta knew abcut the

F33? 111 “No.83/2003 filed IA :~zo..’.r under

1*§rflé¢~izguief1U CQC to implead him as a yarty he

thmufin3; d§raa proceadings. Under tbs impugned

~¢rde£.§fia Trial Court dismissed I.A.Na.? filed by

‘V’.A’tVher’.petitioner. Hence this ifxrit Petitien.

4. It is not in di$puta that during the
pendency er the suit in G.S.H:>.15G6z’1994, 2″‘

respvndent said one sf the plaint schedule

g;4«f\w”

wwwm W3″ wmmmmma mwm MUWKE aw mmmmmmm 2-imam muum ma- amxNA’l’m§A HIGH COURY OF KARNATAKA Hm!-I cam? {W KARNKYAKA HWH COM

properties in favnur cf the petitianérV fié§eifi;
Therefore, petitioner had stappad ifi£§fgnE”$haé$

af 2″‘.ra5p0ndant. The petitiaé§:;i3.éfifif1éfif°

request the final dacre$”n;ur£wfG: afiffigtmgnt
the share$ and alas for a§iu$tmenfi”efi:éqfiities
accordance with 1aw;f_T§e§af¢3a;=@he presence

the patitianar

am»

¢.1:’–

in

cf

‘-ig=.’ne;efi33ryy” far final

adjudicatiah in tfih fifiai’éafiraa proceedings and

also to ré§o$§§W Eh§w3Q§fi££o§$réy between the
parties-j “”” “Thé Eifiai fl dggfééfl court without
apprecia€in§~thi% §g§¢¢§%§E the matter, ccmmitted
V’ % A S implaading

an arrar “~in :disfii33ing the

V 2 ….. .. N

‘Wufi,fi§: §hgTfi§é3ens stated above, the follawing:
. ‘.__ , ggggfi

V”» Ti} – firit Eetition is haraby allwad.

3x*,fii} The imgugned order datum §.4.28G9 in
FfiP H9.83f2663 gassed by the XXII
fi@dl.Cifiy Givil fiudgs at Eangalara is

hereby set aside.

OWV’