High Court Kerala High Court

K.Ajitha Kumari vs State Of Kerala on 19 January, 2011

Kerala High Court
K.Ajitha Kumari vs State Of Kerala on 19 January, 2011
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 1891 of 2011(J)


1. K.AJITHA KUMARI, W/O.RAVI KUMAR,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE STATIONARY CONTROLLER, VIKAS BHAVAN,

3. THE ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF STATIONARY,

4. THE ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF STATIONARY,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.B.MOHANLAL

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :19/01/2011

 O R D E R
                              S. Siri Jagan, J.
                =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                        W.P(C) No. 1891 of 2011
                =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
               Dated this, the 19th day of January, 2011.

                             J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is presently working as Mechanic Grade I in the

office of the Assistant Controller of Stationary, Kozhikode.

Petitioner’s home district is Kollam. Petitioner’s husband is afflicted

by a very rare decease to the eye known as Proliferative Diabetic

Retinopathy, as a result of which he had suffered loss of vision.

Consequently, he has to depend on his wife even for his day-to-day

activities. According to the petitioner, as per Ext. P4 Government

Order, the Government servants having such spouses are entitled to

transfer to the station of their choice. Therefore, the petitioner seeks

a transfer to Kollam. Seeking this relief, the petitioner has filed

Exts.P6 and P8 before the 1st respondent. The petitioner seeks a

direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P6

ad P8 expeditiously.

Having heard the learned Government Pleader also, I dispose of

this writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and

pass orders on Exts.P.6 and P8 as expeditiously as possible, at any

rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the

petitioner. If the 1st respondent is inclined to concede to the request

of the petitioner, the petitioner shall be considered for

accommodation in one of the vacancies at Kollam which may arise on

31.3.2011, on account of retirement.

Sd/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge.

Tds/

[TRUE COPY]

P.S TO JUDGE.