High Court Karnataka High Court

K Bramahanda Reddy vs State By Bagepalli Police Station on 2 December, 2009

Karnataka High Court
K Bramahanda Reddy vs State By Bagepalli Police Station on 2 December, 2009
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh
m 'rm mm comm' as  A1' u  2

man was am 02'' my ofi4én1;::$~néEa;%«M

BEE'd1§'.E._
mm mm' nu ma. JfUSTICE._ i:i2TLUYADi' as. 
cnmz. 9§*ri'rxc>1§%%xo§'%s5;#:%§1L}2oo9

szmm: %
    
s/0 crmm mun!  é j  
was "33 "  ' " 

pmsmr kE'smme'-': 3*. '::cs.2a_i§;" 

Hams'; c:;*:;:m'=..:,;j'=..
 '   '     . . .. wrxrzmmn
_,- (By  & ASSTS, ADV)

S"2'.l'£':.',V1«.*.£-.~'BVv3.t"  muss srawxoaz
aim comm' nuzwme

V' :'{'§y».s$»:.: SATISH. R.GIRJI. 3599.:

$31."? FILE}? U/5.439 CR.P.G BY 'I'EIE

 ~ F511 TIE PETITIQQER PRRYING '£153? THIS

W  W wwvm-am mm-I t..'0uR_T -0.F KARNATAKA HIGH count or KARNATAKA e-non coum or KARNATAKA me:-z COURT or KARNATAKA o-ucm c.-uux

Imvsw awn!' my 33 pmxnsmza m RELEASE 'rm
PE$'I'£'IQi~ISR cw BAIL I1? cam m.142r'2ca9 oz"
Bmxyaznx 90515: STATION (c.<:.m. 246/2009).
ma um osymtcs Pififss 143, 147, 148,. 324,
325, 364.. 354(4), 129;»), am an: 34 or xxac.

*

WW’

»*'”* ‘-M ‘V'”‘”W”\”‘”\-V” ‘WWW “–‘-J’-#i\A’,..Mg;r’r Ixnnlvi-\lAI\I~\ NIUI1 LUUKF U!” KAKNAIAKA HIGH CUUR7 OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNAWFAKA HIGH LUUR

my, ‘1’!-E ccmntr mm ‘I’£E

wars PETITION coamwe 6251 mg 3

oR9$3 %

The petitioner: ‘ V” – .. A fcfi ‘ H§’r §av§:t: of
bail in czannactian ‘,’:§::: m§.:’%%i4f;a:M;_%142/2009 or
Bagepulli Ithe alleged
ottenaas V”SV.@’::i:ions 143, 141,
143, a:zV4;.’kT s:.$%ifi3%, jk:3?é.%%%3k§6%4c§;§;”&i2o<b:. so': 1:/w 34

of IPC _V ~

Jiaurnad counsel for the

the leazznad Gov-azznment Fleadez.

of alleged assault by the

"'»-'~.__'p§titi¢3:L§ur an the brother at the comlainant,
has bean reqiatered wainst him. apart
assaulting the injured, he also said ta

A lime kidnmped him.

xx”

was

””””””W’ “N” ‘-“UK”?-Q_F KARNATAKA men COURT OF KARNATAKP Hat-:-H (SOUR? or KARNAYAKA HEGI-f COURT OF KARNA’fAKA 1-arcs:-c cuux

4. Acaoxding to tha lcarnqé, §:aun.e§’é1’~.:::’§§£~: v€’:1′.1& ‘ ” 2
patitioner, it is a d;$.Ta;:u«i:»s;’

with at the potitiono:if:_ ‘*–~:;:.as”V-aglar;

affidavit regarding; aetAt.JL§§m:§rs1;.

sought for grant oQf””¥£§i1–.__

5. The learumé’Gé#&r$mna§ r;§€d§r submitted
that then?’ to tha incident:

and aa¢$£difig1yffx§§i§:oé gtgnt at hail.

6. Haviizg ” _ t:o the facts and

cixc1égfit~anceé”w~..V§§;§____}tha can. it its flax: the

to: release the patitiener on

suitable canditicns. wince

a1r§£ac;y*v:’ i.£xi§astigation is cornpletcd and charge
Accordingly; the petition in

art.

sci/-

IUDGE

mwkf-‘*