K.C.Cheriya Kunhunni Raja @ … vs Secretary To Government on 17 December, 2008

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 19555 of 2008(C)


1. K.C.CHERIYA KUNHUNNI RAJA @ ERALPAD
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
                       ...       Respondent

2. COMMISSIONER,

3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,

4. RAJA DINESH VARMA P.K.,

                For Petitioner  :SMT.SHAHNA KARTHIKEYAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH
The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :17/12/2008

 O R D E R
      KURIAN JOSEPH & T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ.
              ----------------------------------------------
                   W.P.(C) No.19555 of 2008
              ----------------------------------------------
                 Dated 17th December, 2008.

                          J U D G M E N T

Kurian Joseph, J.

Challenge is on Ext.P14 order passed by the

Government and the orders leading to Ext.P14. The issue

pertains to the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the 4th

respondent. The Government as per the impugned order

affirmed Ext.P11 order passed by the Deputy Commissioner and

Ext.P12 order passed by the Commissioner. As per Ext.P11, the

Deputy Commissioner directed to reinstate the 4th respondent

with back wages. When the writ petition came up before us, in

view of the strained relationship between the petitioner and 4th

respondent, the 4th respondent submitted that he is prepared to

discontinue his service under the petitioner, in case he is paid an

amount of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only), in full and final

settlement of his entire claims and on further condition that the

petitioner drops the entire allegations and charges against him.

Both parties have no objection to the said course of action. The

petitioner has handed over the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- to the 4th

respondent through his counsel. Learned counsel for the

WP(C) NO.19555/08 2

petitioner submitted that the petitioner does not want to pursue

any charges against the 4th respondent, and the proceedings can

be treated as closed. Learned counsel for the 4th respondent

submits that the 4th respondent will not make any further claim

in respect of his service under the petitioner. The above

submissions are recorded and the writ petition is closed.

KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.

T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.

tgs

KURIAN JOSEPH &

T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JJ

———————————————-

W.P.(C) No.19555 of 2008

———————————————-

J U D G M E N T

Dated 17th December, 2008.