High Court Kerala High Court

K.C.Mohanan vs State Of Kerala on 1 October, 2007

Kerala High Court
K.C.Mohanan vs State Of Kerala on 1 October, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 5913 of 2007()


1. K.C.MOHANAN,S/O.ANANTAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :01/10/2007

 O R D E R
                               R.BASANT, J
                        ------------------------------------
                         B.A.No.5913 of 2007
                       -------------------------------------
               Dated this the 1st day of October, 2007

                                    ORDER

Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner faces indictment

in a prosecution under Section 420 I.P.C. Crime was registered on the

basis of a private complaint referred to the police by the learned

Magistrate under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. In that pending

proceedings, there was an attempt for settlement. Matter was

referred to the Lok Adalat. The matter was not settled. When the

case was posted for trail, the petitioner was absent. Thereupon a

warrant of arrest has been issued against the petitioner. The absence

of the petitioner was on 18.07.07.

2. According to the petitioner, he is absolutely innocent. His

absence was not wilful or deliberate. The petitioner is willing to

surrender before the learned Magistrate, apply for bail and co-operate

with the court for expeditious disposal of the case. But the petitioner

apprehends that his application for bail may not be considered by the

learned Magistrate on merits, in accordance with law and

expeditiously. It is therefore prayed that directions under Section 438

and/or 482 Cr.P.C may be issued in favour of the petitioner.

B.A.No.5913 of 2007 2

3. It is for the petitioner to appear before the learned

Magistrate and explain to the learned Magistrate the circumstances

under which he could not earlier appear before the learned Magistrate.

I have no reason to assume that the learned Magistrate would not

consider such application on merits, in accordance with law and

expeditiously. Every court must do the same. No special or specific

direction appears to be necessary. Sufficient general directions have

already been issued in Alice George v. The Deputy Superintendent

of Police [2003(1) KLT 339].

4. This bail application is, in these circumstances, dismissed,

but with the specific observation that if the petitioner appears before

the learned Magistrate and applies for bail after giving sufficient prior

notice to the Prosecutor in charge of the case, the learned Magistrate

must proceed to pass appropriate orders on merits and expeditiously –

on the date of surrender itself.

5. Hand over a copy of this order to the learned counsel for

the petitioner.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
rtr/-